My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-07-23_REVISION - C1992080
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1992080
>
2008-07-23_REVISION - C1992080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:34:54 PM
Creation date
3/3/2011 11:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/23/2008
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Savage & Savage
Type & Sequence
RN3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r v <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 C O L D P ADO <br />? <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 DIVI S I O N OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 MINING <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br /> SAFETY <br />July 23, 2008 <br /> Bill Ritter, Jr. <br /> <br />Mr. Michael S. Savage Governor <br /> <br />Savage and Savage Environmental Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />4610 Haystack Drive Ronald W. Cattany <br />Windsor, CO 80550 Division Director <br /> Natural Resource Trustee <br />Re: Carbon Junction Mine, DRMS Permit C-92-080 <br />Permit Renewal 3 (RN-03) <br />Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Savage: <br />DRMS has reviewed your letter of July 2, 2008 in which you responded to our <br />preliminary adequacy comments (DRMS letter of April 11, 2008). Your responses <br />satisfy all of our comments for Permit Renewal 3 (RN-03). <br />Regarding our comment 2 in the April 11 letter, although our comment addressed topsoil <br />stockpile number 4 and your response addressed topsoil stockpile number 7, we agree <br />that regrading of topsoil stockpile 7 is unwarranted. Since our April 11 letter, the <br />Division has also determined that further regrading of stockpile number 4 is unwarranted <br />because only a relatively small part of the stockpile on the north slope is excessively <br />steep (see our June 2008 inspection report). Regrading would redisturb much of the <br />stockpile and, therefore, is not justified. <br />We are reviewing the mine's reclamation cost estimate for the reduction of the amounts <br />requested in your letter of July 10, 2008. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Tom Kaldenbach <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Dan Hernandez, via email <br />Office of 4 Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver Grand )unction Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.