My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-01-13_REVISION - C1981038 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981038
>
2011-01-13_REVISION - C1981038 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:57 PM
Creation date
3/1/2011 8:09:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/13/2011
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings
From
DRMS
To
Bowie Resources, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR4
Email Name
JJD
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Valley Floors. Slope outwash deposits and alluvial deposits located upslope (northwest) of the <br />Fire Mountain Canal did not meet the geologic and water availability criteria, and were given no <br />further consideration. The Alluvial Valley Floor along the North Fork continues downstream, as <br />shown on Map 5-2. <br />The operator will be affecting 11.4 percent of the Terror Creek watershed. This area and the <br />adjacent Terror Creek were not considered in the Division's original Alluvial Valley Floor <br />determination August 20, 1981, but were considered during the review of the permit revision of <br />June 20, 1985. The operator did not identify any areas along Terror Creek that contain <br />significant bodies of alluvium. Most of the deposits are colluvial in nature and confined to the <br />immediate stream channel. The Morrell Camp area contains primarily colluvial deposits and as <br />such does not meet the definition of Alluvial Valley Floors. <br />East and West Roatcap Creek were also not determined to be Alluvial Valley Floors. The <br />sediments are predominately colluvial in nature and are too limited to support agricultural <br />activities. <br />In reviewing the original application, some concerns were raised over whether the applicant <br />proposed to use augmentation water that would normally supply an AVF. The applicant <br />responded by showing that Terror Ditch and West Reservoir waters supply Garvin Mesa and an <br />irrigated area known as "The Basin," both of which are out of the valley floor complex and are <br />not Alluvial Valley Floors. Therefore, the Bowie No. 1 Mine will not be affecting an AVF <br />because of augmentation mitigation. <br />Alluvial Valley Floors - Findings <br />The applicant is eligible for exemption from the requirements of Section 34-3 3 -114(2)(e)(11) of <br />C.R.S. 1973 by virtue of having a permit issued before August 3,1977. This permit was a <br />License to Mine, issued by the Colorado Division of Mines on December 14,1976. This was the <br />primary permit required at the time by Colorado law to operate an underground coal mine. The <br />extent of this exemption must be based upon a demonstration of financial or regulatory <br />commitment to mine before August 3,1977. In this case, mine maps submitted to the Division <br />of Mines and information in the permit application (see "Ground Water Investigation of Steven's <br />Gulch" in Volume 4) provide the appropriate financial or regulatory demonstration. Therefore, <br />the area identified as an Alluvial Valley Floor along the North Fork of the Gunnison River is <br />exempt from the requirements of Section 34-33-114(2)(e)(I). The permit revision areas and the <br />potential Alluvial Valley Floor in adjacent Terror Creek are not covered by the grandfather <br />provision, and will be discussed separately. <br />Although exempted from Section 34-33-114(2)(e)(I), the applicant must still comply with Section <br />34-33-120(2)0)(VI) for all activities that involve surface operations or surface impacts incident <br />to the underground portions of the mine. To demonstrate compliance, the applicant must <br />identify the essential hydrologic functions of an Alluvial Valley Floor and submit a plan <br />demonstrating that the essential hydrologic functions can be preserved throughout mining or <br />restored after mining. <br />The essential hydrologic functions of the AVF along the North Fork of the Gunnison are both <br />flood irrigation and subirrigation. The lower levels of this AVF are subirrigated naturally. Yet, <br />the upper portions, between the Farmers Ditch and the river, which exhibit some subirrigation, <br />may be attributed to recharge from adjacent irrigation ditches and canals. In these areas flood <br />irrigation is the essential function. <br />43
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.