My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-24_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010049
>
2011-02-24_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:11 PM
Creation date
2/25/2011 7:48:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010049
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/24/2011
Doc Name
Reply to Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Varra Companies, Inc. <br />Office of Special Projects <br />8120 Gage Street Frederick Colorado 80516 Telephone (970) 353-8310 Fax(970)353-4047 <br />7. The Dewatering Evaluation provided by CGRS states that groundwater will <br />be pumped into unlined ponds east of the mine. However, the Mine Plan states <br />water will be pumped into the upland drainage seep and will flow to the Cache <br />La Poudre River. Please clarify this discrepancy. <br />As stated, in #3, above; discharge will utilize the Seep; consistent with the <br />approved discharge plan and permit. At the time C.G.R.S. was assessing the <br />discharge in its report, it was evaluating discharge through an option of entering <br />the discharge waters into the basin to the immediate east of the permit <br />boundary, where the existing Durham operation has an approved discharge <br />point. While C.G.R.S. verified that the Seep would not alter the evaluations made <br />in the report, the option to utilize the adjacent facilities is something the <br />operator would like to retain in the approved permit. <br />8. The Dewatering Evaluation provided by CGRS was carried out under the <br />assumption only one pit will be dewatered at a time. The Mine Plan provides for <br />simultaneous extraction of the pits by posting of additional warranty. Please <br />clarify if the Operator will only dewater one pit at a time. If the Operator <br />anticipates dewatering the cells concurrently, then the Dewatering Evaluation <br />must be revised to reflect this. <br />We believe this option is properly assessed by CGRS in their correspondence of <br />15 February 2011, included with this submittal. Please refer also to #10, below. <br />9. The Division is currently reviewing CGRS's Dewatering Evaluation and <br />additional comments will be forthcoming. <br />Varra Companies, Inc. correspondence of 23 February 2011 to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation 5 <br />(OMLR) in reply to OMLR correspondence of 4 October 2010 - Western Sugar Reclamation Land <br />Development Project- M-2010-049.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.