My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-24_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010049
>
2011-02-24_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:11 PM
Creation date
2/25/2011 7:48:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010049
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/24/2011
Doc Name
Reply to Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Varra Companies, Inc. <br />Office of Special Projects <br />8120 Gage Street Frederick, Colorado 80516 Telephone (970) 353-8310 Fax(970)353-4047 <br />Our planned reclamation will create viable water storage and management <br />basins, without cost to the taxpayer, into a blighted field whose above ground <br />vegetation will be returned to predominantly native grasses; grasses which vary <br />in form, height, color and function for maximum effect. Since the resulting basin <br />detention will exceed any temporary or permanent diversions, the site acts as <br />latent potential to diminish the impacts of occasional floodwaters which it does <br />by lowering peak flows. Since floodwaters at this location are generally <br />understood to be depositional, the retreating waters may leave cottonwood <br />seeds carried in from upstream locations, providing a pathway for regeneration <br />of the desired tree over a span of time. <br />A-4. The application indicates that the resulting ponds may be lined. If so, the <br />applicant must submit data regarding the resulting mounding and shadow effects <br />around the lined ponds, and the mitigation measures that it will take to correct <br />these effects if it will result in impacts to surrounding land, vegetation, and <br />structures. <br />There is nothing in the rules and regulations compelling such a study `must' be <br />done, absent of merit. Again, minimizing disturbance to the prevailing <br />hydrologic balance does not mean eliminate disturbance to the prevailing <br />hydrologic balance. The intent is that significant impact not occur, and any <br />proposed studies should be justified based upon an empirical understanding of <br />the diverse elements at play, and some judgment as to what rises to a proper <br />level of concern where such study is necessary to complete what cannot <br />otherwise be readily discerned. Where circumstances warrant such studies to <br />prevent significant impact, it would be understandable. Empirically, the location <br />and elevation of the lands to be permitted relative to the surrounding lands, <br />features and uses, suggests that impacts to those surrounding lands is minimal <br />and further study to affirm the obvious is not warranted. <br />For example, the developed lands to the north are separated from the operation <br />by the Cache La Poudre River. To the east, an existing mining operation will <br />create lands that cannot be developed in the floodplain and to an extent that <br />mounding or shadowing effects will not extend. The remaining lands <br />surrounding the planned basins are at elevations of 10± to 20t feet above the <br />Varra Companies, Inc. correspondence of 23 February 2011 to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation 15 <br />(OMLR) in reply to OMLR correspondence of 4 October 2010 - Western Sugar Reclamation Land <br />Development Project- M-2010-049.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.