Laserfiche WebLink
September 21,2010 C-1982-057/Seneca II-W Mine JR&C� <br /> Bacldilling and Grading Summary <br /> Based on data collected in the field during this inspection, and observations from previous inspections,the <br /> reclaimed areas have been restored to approximate original contour of the pre-mining landscape and as approved <br /> in the permit. The present surface configuration achieved by the backfill and grading of the mined areas closely <br /> resembles the general surface configuration of the land prior to mining. Reclaimed areas blend in well with the <br /> existing undisturbed landscape. Comparison of the data collected in the field is consistent with the approved Post <br /> Mining Topography in Exhibit 20-2 and achieves the approximate original contour. <br /> Reclaimed slopes in the south area are stable. Some areas of rills and gullies are present as discussed above. <br /> During and subsequent to this inspection, SCC was repairing the area of highest concern adjacent to the PM-2A <br /> and PM=2D drainages. SCC conducts an annual rill and gully survey and makes repairs as necessary. See Tab 22, <br /> Revegetation Plan for a more details. The area will be included in the Phase I bond release, and the Division will <br /> continue to monitor in future years. <br /> Dan Mathews and Christy Hulsman walked the PM-4 drainage channel reclamation. The backfilled slopes were <br /> all well vegetated and stable and no erosional problems were noted. No problems with cracking or settling in the <br /> backfill were noted. <br /> There was a 12.1 acre area in the north portion of the mine that was excluded from the Partial Phase I Bond <br /> Release Inspection SL-02 due to a slump. The area is immediately north of an undisturbed area in the 006 Gulch <br /> drainage area. The area was graded to blend into the undisturbed area to the south and will be included in the <br /> Phase I Bond Release SL-03. <br /> HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05 Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2,4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, <br /> 4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7,4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water <br /> Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage—Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; <br /> Impoundments 4.05.6,4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> Certified designs were approved for all post-mine drainage channels prior to this inspection and are <br /> provided in the permit in Tab 20, Attachment 20-1. The permanent channels are designed to safely <br /> convey the peak discharge from the 10-year, 24-hour storm event in accordance with 4.05.3. Post-mine <br /> drainage channels PM-1, PM-lA, PM-1B,PM-IC,PM-2,PM-2A,PM-2B,PM-2C,PM-2D,PM-2E, PM-3, PM- <br /> 3A,PM-4, PM-4A,PM-4B,PM-4C, PM-4D and PM-6 are within this bond release request area and are <br /> shown on Exhibit 20-2—Post-Mining Topography and Drainage and the channel profiles are shown on <br /> Drawing 20.5-9. The channels are also shown on the Division's Inspection Map 2. These channels were <br /> inspected for function with regard to knick points,blending at disturbance boundaries and channel <br /> erosion. In addition to the certified designs, as-built drainage profiles (Exhibit D of the bond release <br /> application package) were also reviewed and evaluated in the field. The entire length of each drainage <br /> channel was walked for comparison with design and as-built information. <br /> The Division took elevation measurements with the Trimble GeoXT and channel bottom width, depth and lining <br /> observations at random points along each channel(with the exception of the PM-4 series of channels). The <br /> corrected elevation points were used to construct a drainage channel profile for each channel,which was compared <br /> with both the as-built channel profile(SL-03 Exhibit D)and the approved design profile(Exhibit 20-5.9, sheets 1 <br /> and 2). The results of the field measurements are provided in the table below and the channel profiles and <br /> data are attached at the end of this inspection report. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Page 4 of 18 <br />