My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-09_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2011-02-09_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:30:54 PM
Creation date
2/15/2011 7:55:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
2/9/2011
Doc Name
Opening Brief of Plaintiff Cotter Corporation
From
Cotter Corporation
To
District Court
Email Name
DB2
AJW
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
alleged to be violated ... and may include the nature of any corrective action proposed to be <br />required." Id. With the exception of section 34-32-124(2)(a), no section of the Act authorizes <br />the Board to order corrective actions. <br />Here, the Board has failed to issue a cease and desist order to Cotter. The Board's Order <br />does not order that Cotter "cease and desist" any activity. AR:00845-53. The words "cease and <br />desist" do not appear in the Order's title or in its ordering provisions. The Order's only mention <br />of the words "cease and desist" appears on page one, which states "THIS MATTER came before <br />the Mined Land Reclamation Board ("Board") ... for a hearing to consider a possible violation, <br />Cease and Desist Order, corrective actions, and civil penalties ...." AR:00845. <br />Notwithstanding this language, no cease and desist order was issued. <br />Because the Board failed to issue a "cease and desist" order to Cotter, the portion of the <br />Order requiring that Cotter perform Mine Dewatering and Treatment is in excess of statutory <br />jurisdiction and authority. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 34-32-124(2)(a). Such requirement is therefore <br />unlawful and should be set aside. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-4-106(7). <br />40
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.