2011-02-03_HYDROLOGY - M1978052

• Permit No: M1978052
• IBM Index Class Name: HYDROLOGY
• Doc Date: 2/3/2011
• Doc Name: Combined Replacement Plan
• From: OSE
• To: Applegate Group, Inc.
• Permit Index Doc Type: Hydrology Report
• Email Name: DB2
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Appendix A
Lafarge West, Inc.
Riverbend East
Substitute WaterSupplyPlan - Evaporative Losses
roll, Applegate
Group, h.

Month Percent of
Annual
Evaporation
A Gross Lake
Evaporation
(ft)
B
Precipitation
(in) Effective
Precipitation
(ft)
D Net Lake
Evaporation
(acre-ft/acre) Total lake
Evaporation
(ac-ft)
Nov-10 4.0% 0.15 1.01 0.06 0.09 2.56
Dec-10 3.0% 0.11 0.84 0.05 0.06 1.78
]an-11 3.0% 0.11 0.81 0.05 0.07 1.83
Feb-11 3.5% 0.13 0.47 0.03 0.10 2.93
Mar-11 5.5% 0.21 0.44 0.03 0.18 4.56
A rll 9.0% 0.34 0.39 0.02 0.31 7.94
May-11 12.0% 0.45 1.17 0.07 0.38 9.62
Jun-11 14.5% 0.54 1.69 0.10 0.45 11.22
Jul-11 15.0% 0.56 2.29 0.13 0.43 10.82
Au 11 13.5% 0.51 1.64 0.10 0.41 10.34
Se 11 10.0% 0.38 1.58 0.09 0.28 7.12
Oct 11 7.0% 0.26 1.68 0.10 0.16 4.14
Total 100% 3.8 14.0 0.8 2.9 74.9
Total Exposed Water Surface = 28.1 acres (November 2010 to February 2011)
25.2 acres (March 2011 to October 2011)
Annual Predpkation = 14.0 Indies - Estimated using the COSS website's isohyet map
Gross Annual Evaporation = 45 Indies -Taken from NOAA Technical Report NWS 33
(A) Taken from General Guidelines for Substitute Water Supply Plans for Sand and GmW Pits Submitted to The State Engineer
(B) Gross lake evaporation = (A) *(Gross Annual Evaporation / 12)
(C) Monthly precipitation distribution based on WRCC station in Brighton
(D) Effective precipitation = 0.7*(C)/12
(E) Net lake evaporation from exposed water surfaces = (B) - (D)
(F) Total lake evaporation from exposed water surfaces = (E) * Total Exposed Water Surface
Subsetute Water Supply Plan - Operational Losses

Month Percent of
Annual
Aggregate
Production
A
Aggregate
Production
(tons)
B Water Used
For Dust
Control
(ac-ft)
C Water Used
For
Washing
(ac-ft)
D Total
Operational
Consumptive Use
(ac-ft)
E Total
Evaporative
CU
(ac-ft) Total
Consumptive
Use
(arft)
G Total
Lagged
Depletions
(ac-ft)
H
Nov-10 0.0% 0 1.25 0.00 1.25 2.56 3.81 6.60
Dec-10 0.0% 0 1.25 0.00 1.25 1.78 3.03 5.92
Jan-11 010% 0 1.25 0000 1.25 1.83 3.08 5.39
Feb-11 0.0% 0 1.25 0.00 1.25 2.93 4.18 5.20
Mar-11 13.3% 100,000 1.25 2.94 4.19 4.56 8.75 5.81
Apr-11 13.3% 100,000 1.50 2.94 4.44 7.94 12.38 7.33
May-11 13.3% 100,000 1.50 2.94 4.44 9.62 14.07 8.90
Jun-11 16.7% 125,000 1.75 3.68 5.43 11.22 16.64 10.33
Jul-11 16.7% 125,000 2.00 3.68 5.68 10.82 16.49 11.60
Au 11 13.3% 100,000 2.00 2.94 4.94 10.34 15.29 12.18
Se 11 133% 100 000 1.75 .9 4.69 7.12 11.82
Oct 11 0.% 0 1.50 0.00 1.50 4.14 5.64 L M
Total 100% 750,000 18.3 22.1 40.3 74.9 115.2 Total Material Mined = 750,000
Moisture Content = 4.0%
(A) Aggregate production percentages
(B) Amount of aggregate production based on percent of annual aggregate production. (Total Material Mined) * Column (A).
(C) Water used for dust control. Monthly amounts where distributed based on estimates from Lafarge
(D) Water Used for washing material. Monthly amounts were distributed based on washing projections from Lafarge, assuming 4% loss
(E) Column (C) + Column (D).
(F) Total lake evaporation from exposed water surfaces = Net Lake Evap * Total Exposed Water Surface
(G) Column (E) + Column (F).
(H) Total lagged mining depletions which reflect existing real time conditions in stream depletion model.
WA10108 L.hrp. SwSPf WVSP.Zwffi P1.0. C-bin."l I ESWWW C-bi..d R-.wd CU.a.