Laserfiche WebLink
02/03/2011 THU 14:15 FAX 17198450077 NOW Elk Coal <br />INSPECTION OF EXCESS SPOIL FILL <br />First Quarter 2010 Certification <br />Fill Area No. 9 <br />Date: _ March 103.201 <br />GENERAL DESCRWrION OR REFERENCE TO SITE PLAN; <br />The CTL Thompson report dated April 27, 2001, "Stability Analysis and Ciao-technical Recommendations <br />Lorencito Surface Mine Phase I" addresses the general requirements as also cited in Sections 4.09.1 to <br />4.09.2 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining. <br />ACTIVITY )DURING INSPECTION: <br />Removal of Topsoil and organic Matter <br />_placement of Under-drains <br />-Installation of Surface Drainage Systeto <br />_Construhtion of Fill <br />„Placement of Topsoil <br />Seeding <br />_&Other Faailtty ' final Recl tion - hale I ased <br />SEDIMENT CONTROL <br />Sediment pond construction has been completed in accordance with plans submitted to and approved by the <br />DMG and as-constructed survey/drawings certified by Registered Land Surveyor and Registered <br />Professional Engineer. All surface run-off from the fill areas is directed to this sediment control facility <br />known as pond 9A. No discharge occurred during the quarter. <br />SURFACE DRAINAGE <br />Armored Ditches lino the east and west boundary of the fill area. Lateral ditches an the fill face direct <br />runoff to these side ditches. No erosional problems were noted at the intersections of the lateral ditches and <br />the armored ditches. The main access road across the mine disturbance area was relocated and now crosses <br />along the crest of fill 9. A concrete culvert was installed at the head of the west down drain at the point <br />where the road crosses the drainage. <br />SITE PREPARATION <br />As indicated by previous inspection reports, organic materials such as brush and trees were removed from <br />the proposed fill area followed by topsoil removal prior to fill placement. Design criteria did not require <br />keyway outs for steeper valleys with minimal soil cover (fill #9). No evidence of springs or seeps was <br />observed during site preparation. <br />DRAINAGE SYSTEM (UNDERDRAINS) <br />Drain sizes are specified by CDMCI regulations for fulls which can be classified as Valley Fills. Fill area #9 <br />is not a valley fill. CTL Thompson recommended a minimum 6' x 12' triangular section (area = 64 Sir) for <br />this size fill. As indicated by previous inspection reports, as constructed drainages generally were more <br />trapezoidal with a top width of 12', bottom width of $', and average height of 8' (area = 80 SF). Sandstone <br />recovered from durable "channel" sandstone deposits encountered during the mining process was used in <br />drain construction. Mirafi 160 fabric was used in lieu of filter material. <br />0012/017