My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (19)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-12-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (19)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:43 PM
Creation date
2/1/2011 2:50:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/8/2010
Doc Name
Walsh Report on Subsoil Suitability 2/08 (revised 7/08)
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.4(2)(d) Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d)-1
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
root structures to a depth of greater that 10 feet depth. A single discontinuous layer of broken angular <br />rock about six to twelve itches thick is present within much of the observed cut face. This is the only <br />empetent rock in the bench I cut face. 'Fhe bench 1 material overlies competent overburden, which <br />overlies the coal seams that are mined (sec Photo 1). Bench !material is mechanically removed as a <br />separate unit and is the last overburden unit to he placed over the reclaimed mina As such there are <br />generally several or more feet of the bench 1 material underlying replaced topsoil in the reclaimed <br />areas. <br />Part of the area of the mine south of BB Road and west of 2 ?00 Road (reclassified as prime farmland) <br />and part of the area north of BB Road (ion -prime farmland) have been rained and have had <br />overburden placed, but have not had topsoil replaced (Figure 1). The suitability of the Bench 1 subsoil <br />for use as the lower layer of prime farmland soil is the focus of this study. <br />Preliminary In vestigation <br />On January 31, 2008, WFC personnel obtained six soil samples from the upper two feet of overburden <br />(samples 101 through 106, Figure 1). The soil was analyzed for texture, conductivity, pH, nitrogen, <br />organic matter, some anions and cations, calcium carbonate, moisture, and sodium adsorption ratio. A <br />summary of'results relevant to prime farmhand soil is presented in "Fable 1 and the tab data sheet is <br />attached to this letter. These samples were all within suitability criteria established in the permit and <br />by the NRCS for prime farmland subsoil for target analytes with the exception of one sample which <br />exceeded the electrical conductivity (soluble salts) suitability standard of 4.0 with a reading of 4.1 <br />micromhos /cm. <br />Second Investigation <br />After a meeting with the f+RMS, NRCS, WFC, and other personnel, WFC agreed to further analyze the <br />condition of the subsoil by examining the soil in pits placed on a 2.5 -acre grid (330 feet per side). <br />These grid points were seduentiaily numbered across the portion of the mine that had been mined and <br />partially reclaimed. Of the 34 grid points, twenty were within areas that had been brought to grade <br />with ovefburden and were accessible (c.g. not covered with topsoil pilcs). These locations had soil pits <br />excavated, with 13 south of BB Road (in prime hrmIland) and seven north of BB Road (in non -prime <br />farmland) (sample points numbered 1 th -rough 34, Figure 1). All pits were excavated in areas that had <br />been brought to grade with overburden, but had not been prepared for topsoil placernerr, or had topsoil <br />placed. WFC dug pits using a baekhoe to a depth of three, to four feet Walsh personnel visited tae site <br />on March 5, 2008 and described soil color, texture, percent coarse fraction (gravel, cobbles, stones, and <br />boulders), and hardness. Information was recorded into afield notebook and transferred to Table 2. <br />No boulders (>25 inches) were observed in any soil pit. <br />Soil samples were obtained from the upper two feet of the exposed soil. Samples from the prime <br />farmland area and select samples from the non -prime fannland area were send to Servi -Tech <br />Laboratories of Hastings, Nebraska for pit, texture, calcium carbonate, and exchangeable sodium <br />percentage (BSP) and other analyses. Laboratory results are summarized in Table 2. Selected lab <br />analyses were based on discussions with David Deastyne of the NRCS Montrose office. Mr. <br />Dearstyne stated in an email dated February 20, 2008 that soil deeper than 24 inches in prime farmland <br />should be tested for those parameters and compared to standards (shown on Table 2). If the soil is <br />within these criteria it would provide suitable subsoil (copy of email correspondence is attached). <br />Endo,nmcntal Su ;ntists end Engineers, LLC <br />Revised September 2010 (PR 06) Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d) -1 -3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.