Laserfiche WebLink
Hard Rock/Metal Mining Permit Application Vv".•-?.M?S ?ti, <br />Limited Impact Designated Mining Operation (I 10(d)) <br />Venture Resources, Inc. - Robert Fulton Reclamation Q 42189 <br />Revision 0: January 17, 2011 <br />/-17-x/ <br />Exhibit D - Reclamation Plan ???._••.....•- <br />Overall Reclamation Summary: <br />The proposed Venture Resources' project is a Reclamation Project. <br />Venture Resources owns or leases over 250 acres of property contained within approximately 65 patented mining <br />claims. These mining claims are located in the Russell Gulch and Virginia Canyon vicinity of both Clear Creek and <br />Gilpin counties. For the most part, many of the claims are non-contiguous and located within a 1.5 mile radius of <br />each other. <br />Throughout our property there are approximately 200,000 tons of pre-existing abandoned mine waste rock dumps <br />that have its origin from the late 1800's. We are not alone; there are many hundreds of thousands of tons of similar <br />material located on other's properties in this vicinity. Depending on the individual claim, there may be a pile as <br />large as 50,000 tons (Old Town Lode) down to 1,000 tons (Robert Fulton Lode) as examples. The impacted <br />footprint of the dumps on these mining claims is almost always under 1.5 acres each. <br />We recognized that to clean up these properties, these dumps will have to be reclaimed. They are not only an <br />eyesore, but pose serious environmental damage due to acidic mine water run-off. <br />Following the recommendations directly made in these publications: <br />"Reclamation Feasibility Report - Virginia Canyon", CO DMG, December 2001 <br />"Best Practices in Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation: the remediation of past mining activities", 2002 <br />"EPA Record of Decision R08-88/019 - Central City, Idaho Springs", 1988 <br />we began designing a voluntary program to manage the abandoned waste rock piles on our property. Various <br />scenarios were analyzed for economic feasibility. It was quickly determined it would be an expensive adventure. <br />Capping and revegetation were considered. This would add to the potential real estate value, but there was no <br />immediate return on investment. Additionally, this method only "covered up" the real problem which is the pyritic, <br />sulfide mineral content of the material that is the source of the acidic run-off. There would still be an effect on the <br />groundwater in the future. Repeatedly, the documents referenced above indicate removal is the very best solution. <br />We began doing metallurgical testing to determine whether or not it is feasible to process this material for any trace <br />precious metal content to offset the initial capital outlay. It was determined that at today's prices, it was indeed <br />feasible to construct a processing mill to extract the precious metals and all of the heavy metal contaminants from <br />the waste rock. This brought about a private, voluntary business solution to cleanup an environmental problem <br />caused by the abandoned mine waste rock. The EPA recognized this cleanup methodology in their ROD R08- <br />88/019: <br />"REPROCESSING ALTERNATIVE: THE REPROCESSING ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERS THE <br />TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK PILES AS AN ECONOMIC RESOURCE AND RECOVERS THE <br />INHERENT MONETARY VALUE WHILE GENERATING A WASTE WHICH MAY NOT BE <br />DETRIMENTAL TO THE ENVIRONMENT." <br />"REPROCESSING WOULD BE A PERMANENT SOLUTION THAT ELIMINATED COLLAPSE OF <br />THE TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK PILES. A NEW WASTE TAILINGS IS PRODUCED. <br />LEACHING TESTS SHOW THAT THE NEW TAILINGS CAN BE DISPOSED INA MUNICIPAL <br />LANDFILL. (emphasis added)" <br />Page I of 5