My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-12-08_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:43 PM
Creation date
1/21/2011 5:16:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/8/2010
Doc Name
Vegetation Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.10 Vegetation Information NH2 Mine Area
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
objectives and the level of applied management in any given year (or season) result in short <br />term variation in production, while site characteristics, including topography and depth of soils, <br />determine long term production. Soils range from moderately deep to shallow foams, but most <br />operators acknowledged the presence of rock ridges with shallow soil cover in several of the <br />fields. Topography affects the level of efficiency for irrigation water application when using <br />flood type irrigation. Undulating topography with irregular contours results in areas receiving <br />too little water and other areas receiving an excess, resulting in boggy conditions or the <br />drowning out of more desirable species such as alfalfa. <br />The varying management objectives and level of inputs are best illustrated by summarizing <br />information provided by the various operators during 1987. Goforth makes a conscientious <br />effort towards irrigation water management, fertilizes with approximately 150 pounds /acre of <br />18 -46 -0 fertilizer and occasionally with 150 pounds /acre of potash, and does not overutilize the <br />aftermath in the hay fields during the non - growing season. The fields are also periodically <br />renovated. <br />Periodic renovation and application of phosphorous fertilizer on a regular basis maintains a <br />good alfalfa component in a stand which significantly increases yields and forage quality <br />(Heath et al. 1985 and Schumaker et al. 1967). By comparison, the Morgan hay fields (San <br />Miguel property) were grazed heavily by livestock during the late winter and into the early <br />spring after growth had started. Morgan does not fertilize regularly and alfalfa composition in <br />the stand is low, while poorer producing species, such as Kentucky bluegrass and buckhorn <br />plantain, have a high composition. Several rock ridges with shallow soils also occur in these <br />fields, further reducing potential production. Burbridge, who does not fertilize his hay fields, <br />has little alfalfa in the stand, and significant areas of shallow soils with rock ridges. Combined, <br />these result in a potentially low level of productivity in his hay fields. However the hay <br />production from this field is adequate to meet Burbridge's needs and thus the incentive for <br />more intensified management is not there. It should be pointed out that Burbridge's cut hay <br />was rained on twice and turned twice before baling which will reduce both the yield and quality <br />of hay. Staats' hay production values, though higher than most first cuttings, still does not <br />reflect the potential production. Because of land leveling on Staats' fields, cut areas (exposing <br />subsoil materials with lower production potential) have lower overall yields, though irrigation <br />water management is benefited. Staats' fields (in the proposed permit area) north of Calamity <br />Revised September 2010 (PR 06) 2.04.10 -36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.