Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 SUCCESS EVALUATION <br />4.1 Ground Cover and Production <br />Success evaluations involve a direct comparison (and/or a reverse null statistical test) of appropriate <br />parameters for each variable of interest. Comparisons are made directly with either the reference area <br />parameters or the permitted standards. In the case of ground cover and production, comparisons are <br />directly made against weighted reference area data of the same year. In 2007 and 2008, Cedar Creek <br />was able to make direct comparisons between the revegetated units included in Phase III bond release <br />and reference areas with regard to the variables of ground cover and production. Charts were developed <br />to provide a quick overview of the success of these revegetated efforts in comparison to reference area <br />based criteria. <br />Chart 3 and Table 8 exhibit the results from ground cover sampling, and reveals that the Phase III <br />bond release area significantly exceeds the reference area comparison for both years with 67.8% <br />perennial cover versus the 42.4% perennial cover standard in 2007 (90% of 47.1%) and 65.8% <br />perennial cover versus the 41.3% perennial cover standard in 2008 (90% of 45.9%). Chart 4 and Table <br />8 exhibit the results from production sampling in 2007 and 2008. This chart reveals that Phase III <br />current annual production (1803.4 perennial pounds per acre in 2007 and 1936.2 perennial pounds per <br />acre in 2008) is substantially higher than the success standard of 551.4 perennial pounds per acre in <br />2007 (90% of 612.7 Ibs / ac) and 427.1 perennial pounds per acre in 2008 (90% of 474.6 Ibs / ac). <br />Moreover, Chart 4 reveals that Phase III current annual production is at least double that found on the <br />reference areas. <br />In Summary, Phase III areas addressed by this document strongly surpass the success <br />standards for around cover and production. <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. Page 25 Colowyo Coal Company <br />2008 Phase III Bond Release Evaluation