Laserfiche WebLink
CDOW Rebuttal Statement - Regulation 37 <br />December 2010 Reg. 37 Rule-Making Hearing <br />After submittal of RPHS, the CDOW met with CAM, the EPA, and the WQCD to discuss <br />issues raised in responsive comments. Based on these discussions, the CDOW expects <br />that some common ground may exist. The CDOW will continue to evaluate any <br />additional information submitted to the record by CAM or other parties. <br />References <br />Karpowitz, J.F. 2006. Range-wide Conservation Agreement and Strategy for Roundtail <br />Chub (Gila robusta), Bluehead Sucker (Catastomus discobolus), and <br />Mannelmouth Sucker (Catastomus latipinnis). Utah Department of Natural <br />Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources Publication Number 06-18. Document <br />available online at: http: //wildlife. state. co. usINRlydonlyresIC0157052-214D- <br />4E9D-B9C3-CCCE989EE715/0/ChubSuckerRangewideConservationAgreement <br />andStrategy010407. pdf <br />III. WITNESSES <br />The following CDOW staff may provide testimony on the appropriateness of proposed <br />changes and rebuttal testimony as needed: <br />Jamie Anthony, Ph.D., Water Quality Program Coordinator <br />CDOW reserves the right to call any other witnesses, as needed, for purposes of rebuttal. <br />Respectfully submitted this 26`" day of October 2010. <br />FOR THE COLORADO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE <br />Z. ` <br />Thomas E. Remington <br />Director <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />6060 Broadway <br />Denver, Colorado 80216 <br />December 1, 2010