My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (114)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (114)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:02 PM
Creation date
12/30/2010 10:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 5 Item 2 Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Four Sites Within Project
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Historic Properties Treatment Plan, Collom Mine, Colorado 8 <br />camps) and are expected to contain substantial) different P P y if Brent tool assemblages (Binford 1980; <br />Chatters 1987). Differences in assemblage composition among cultural historic periods may <br />reflect general differences in basic technological organization and in settlement organization <br />(Bamforth 1986; Bleed 1986). It may also be possible to render specific tool kits or other <br />subassemblage.s within overall assemblages to provide insight into specific activities carried out <br />at the site. <br />Data Requireinents: Definable and distinguishable tool assemblages deriving from individual <br />occupations or sets of associated occupations. <br />2.3 SUBSISTENCE PATTERNS <br />Research Topic 1: What animal and plant remains are present in each component? Which <br />animal and plant resources do these remains indicate were acquired and processed during each <br />site occupation or set of associated occupations? What animal and plant resources do ancillary <br />remains e. ., butchering tools roundst <br />( g g , g one, pollen) suggest were being exploited. What were <br />the apparent roles and relative importance of the different species and general types of <br />resources represented in each component and how do the differ? <br />Analysis of subsistence patterns consists of identifying the types of resources acquired, <br />processed, and/or consumed during particular occupations or sets of concomitant occupations <br />at the site. Relevant data to the reconstruction of subsistence patterns includes both direct <br />evidence in the form of faunal remains and charred seeds from cultural contexts and indirect <br />evidence in the form of flaked stone tool types, groundstone, elevated pollen counts for <br />economic plans: species, blood residue, etc. (Hurlbett 1977; Madsen 1982; McGarry n.d). <br />Combined, those various lines of evidence point to the general types or resources being procured <br />(e.g., large animals, small animals, seeds, tubers), the particular genera or species being used, <br />and the relative importance of each resource type during the site occupations. The particular <br />type and format of resources being acquired provides crucial evidence in regards to the <br />47599 TRC Mariah Associates Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.