My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (153)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (153)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:04 PM
Creation date
12/30/2010 10:50:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 7 Item 21 Collom Project Pre-Feasibility Hdyrology Report
Type & Sequence
PR3
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
62 Groundwater <br />In general, groundwater elevations in the bedrock wells did not vary more than 10 ft after <br />the initial post - development equilibration period. The exceptions were: <br />• PC- 04 -25FG (screened in the Fab seam), which has dropped 16 ft since <br />it was installed; <br />MWC -04 -29FS and PC -04 -29FS, both of which have dropped 12 ft; <br />MWC- 04 -29H, which has dropped 17 ft; <br />PC -04 -081, which has risen 17 ft; and <br />PC -04 -281, has been dry since shortly after it was installed. <br />Given that most of the wells were installed relatively recently in a complex hydrogeologic <br />environment, the causes.and significance of these water level changes cannot be easily <br />determined. Water levels in these wells will be evaluated at a later date to determine <br />whether the observed changes are attributable to installation of the wells or reflect some <br />normal component of hydraulic behavior. <br />The absence of water in upgradient well PC -04 -281 indicates that the I sandstone is not <br />saturated at this location. The observation that the other two I sandstone piezometers <br />(81 and 381) both display a rising water level, with increases of 17 and 5 ft, respectively, <br />( may be indicative of a very low permeability unit with limited recharge. <br />As shown on Figures 5.11 through 5.14, groundwater flows down dip towards the north. <br />Relatively steep gradients occur on the south portion of the mine footprint (approximately 0.3 <br />in the F sandstone and 0.18 in the F/G sequence). The gradients flatten considerably in the <br />central and southern parts of the proposed Collom Mine to approximately 0.04 in the F, H, <br />and I sandstones and F/G sequence. <br />Valley fill levels <br />Valley fill groundwater elevations appear to be controlled by a combination of the nearby <br />streams and seasonal variations in flux through the valley fill. For the period of record <br />(August 2004 through May 2005), alluvial water levels generally increased. <br />Hydrographs for the alluvial wells are provided in Appendix 5.J. <br />5.2.11 Groundwater quality monitoring <br />Water quality samples were collected for baseline monitoring of the pre- mining <br />environment. The data will be used to help evaluate the potential hydrologic impacts <br />that may occur as a result of result of coal mining. Until development of the mine starts, <br />the purpose of the groundwater quality monitoring programs is to collect representative <br />data that reflect both the temporal and spatial variations across the site. Currently, the <br />baseline groundwater sampling program has met the sampling frequency and parameter <br />requirements established in the Work Plan, which was reviewed and approved by the <br />CDMG (Section 1.1). <br />2572 -R2 Colowyo Coal Company <br />Water Management Consultants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.