My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (109)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (109)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:02 PM
Creation date
12/29/2010 4:19:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Rule 2.06 Special Mining Categories
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />canyon walls near the mine on a seasonal basis, and in some of the unconsolidated valley fill. Little <br />Collom Gulch is ephemeral, and did not produce measurable flow during the baseline hydrologic <br />monitoring efforts described in Section 2.04.7. Very little water is found in the current active mine; and, <br />based on existing geological and hydrological evidence, the areas to be mined provide no or only minor <br />amounts of recharge to local surface water features. <br />Geomorphic Characteristics <br />Tetra Tech's (2005) investigation included mapping unconsolidated deposits in the Collom permit <br />expansion area, using published and unpublished geologic maps and ground reconnaissance. These <br />deposits are shown in Figure 1 of Exhibit 7, Item 24. Much of the mapped deposits contained substantial <br />proportions of colluvium and /or sheetwash. Valley bottoms elsewhere within the permit expansion area <br />were very narrow and historically uncultivated, or contained significant amount of colluvium or <br />sheetwash. The source material for the valley fills was primarily erosion and deposition of loess, leading <br />to a loamy soil texture which supports more lush vegetation than adjacent uplands, even absent sub - <br />irrigation. Most floodplains in the area are generally extremely narrow (less than 20 feet), have been <br />severely down -cut, and/or contain too much topographic relief in the form of slopes to be considered <br />capable of being irrigated. Due to downcutting, flooding does not extend beyond the limits of the incised <br />channel. <br />Flood Irrigation and Agricultural Activities <br />Section 2.04.3 contains a description and map of agricultural activities in the permit and adjacent area. <br />The Premining and Postmining Land Use Map (Map 17) shows that the historic pre- mining land use of <br />the area has been generally undeveloped rangeland. Based on repeated field investigations, there is no <br />evidence of historical flood irrigation in the Collom permit expansion area. However, documentation <br />exists indicating several small parcels totaling approximately 2.4 acres and located along the West Fork of <br />Jubb Creek were historically used for hay production. Additional exceptions to undeveloped range land <br />in the permit area include the presence of equipment staging areas, small structures, reservoirs, roads, and <br />stream crossings. Historically, there has not been a developed water supply for agricultural activities in <br />the potentially- affected drainages; however, some limited irrigation is conducted in the floodplain of <br />Wilson Creek, outside the proposed southern permit boundary above areas downcut during the mid - <br />1980's. Prior to the mid 1980's, flood irrigation did occur northeast of the current Gossard Loadout <br />factilities across Highway 17, outside Colowyo's permit boundary, away from any prior mine related <br />activities or planned disturbance associated with the Collom Access Road. The area of concern <br />surrounding the Gossard Loadout Facility was bypassed historically in order to apply irrigation water <br />downstream in the bottom lands outside the current permit boundary. There is no evidence the area <br />around the Gossard Loadout Facility was ever irrigated in the past. Irrigation diversion points, irrigation <br />canals, and topography are shown on Map IOB. These areas are well outside the subject drainages of <br />Collom Gulch, Little Collom Gulch, and Jubb Creek. <br />Subirrigation <br />Depths to groundwater for the area have been reported to occur in valley fill (floodplain) materials <br />anywhere between 9 feet below ground surface (bgs) along West Fork Jubb Creek, to greater than 47 feet <br />bgs within Little Collom Gulch. The historical average Depth to Water at the Gossard Well directly <br />Northeast of the Gossard Loadout Facilitites is approximately 21 feet (2009 Annual Reclamation Report) <br />Tetra Tech (2005) concluded that such depths to groundwater are too great to allow for agriculturally <br />significant subirrigation. Further information on groundwater occurrence is provided in Section 2.04.7. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 132 Revision Date: 1/23/09 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.