My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-27_REVISION - C1981019 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-27_REVISION - C1981019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:19 PM
Creation date
12/28/2010 4:17:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/27/2010
Doc Name
Updated Dec 10 2006 Phase II Bond Release Evaluation
From
Colowyo/Cedar Creek
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL4
Email Name
JRS
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be completed. In this manner, edge transects were retained entirely within the target unit by "bouncing" <br />off the boundaries. <br />2.2 Determination of Ground Cover <br />Ground cover at each sample point was determined utilizing the point- intercept methodology as <br />illustrated on Figure 1. As indicated on this figure, Cedar Creek utilizes new state -of- the -art <br />instrumentation it has pioneered to facilitate much more rapid and accurate collection of data. A transect <br />of 10 meters length was extended in the direction of the next sampling location from the flagged center <br />of each systematically located sample point. At each one -meter interval along the transect, a "laser point <br />bar" was situated parallel to, and approximately 4.5 to 5.0 feet vertically above the ground surface. A <br />set of 10 readings was recorded as to hits on vegetation (by species), litter, standing dead, rock <br />( >2mm), or bare soil. Hits were determined at each meter interval by activating a battery of 10 low - <br />energy specialized lasers ** situated along the bar at 10 centimeter intervals and recording the variable <br />intercepted by each of the narrowly focused (0.02 (see Figure 1). In this manner, a total of 100 <br />intercepts per transect were recorded resulting in 1 percent cover per intercept. This methodology and <br />instrumentation facilitates the collection of the most unbiased, repeatable, and precise ground cover data <br />possible. Identification and nomenclature of plant species follows Weber and Wittman (1996) Colorado <br />Flora: Western Slope. <br />2.3 Sample Adeauacv Determination <br />Sampling within each managerial unit was conducted to a minimum of 15 or 30 samples per unit. <br />From these preliminary efforts, the sample mean and standard deviation for total non - overlapping <br />vegetation ground cover was calculated. For non - monitoring applications, the typical procedure is that <br />sampling continues until an adequate sample, n m i,,, has been collected in accordance with the Cochran <br />formula (below) for determining sample adequacy, whereby the population is estimated to within 10% of <br />the true mean (p) with 90% confidence. <br />When the inequality (n m iā 5 n) is true, sampling is deemed adequate; and n mi ā is determined as <br />follows: <br />+` Lasers utilized for this instrument are state -of- the -art and of specialized design to emit a unique electro- magnetic <br />wavelength visible under full sunlight, a condition previously not possible with portable low- energy lasers. <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. Page 5 Colowyo Coal Company <br />2006 Phase II Evaluation (Updated Dec -10) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.