Laserfiche WebLink
• Table 2.7-2c. Topsoil and spoil material analysts comparisons for plant growth <br />suitability at Trapper Mine (19851989). <br />Topsoil Spoil <br />1Neighed x (1) Weighed x (2) <br />pH (standard units) 7.24 7.38 <br />Electro Conductivity (mmhos/cm) 0.84 1.98 <br />Calcium Carbonate (%) 0.94 5.67 <br />Organic Matter (%) 3.80 4.08 <br />Nitrate 21.79 7.37 <br />Phosphorus 14.36 1.47 <br />Potassium 268.71 102.80 <br />Zinc 1.97 6.56 <br />Iron 36.69 32.02 <br />Manganese 15.79 11.85 <br />Copper 2.88 4.80 <br />Selenium 0.017 0.09 <br />Calcium (meg/I in sat ext) 6.09 13.86 <br />Manganese (meg/I in sat ext) 2.21 11.85 <br />Sodium (meg/I in sat ext) 0.48 2.06 <br />S.A.R. (---_ 0.25 0.65 <br />Saturation 42.64 42.46 <br />Texture Clayey loam Clayey loam <br />• <br />Sand 33.55 33.38 <br />°b Silt 34.64 30.71 <br />°b Clay 31.79 35.94 <br />Mercury (mg/kg) 0.05 0.08 <br />Flourine 0.14 0.40 <br />Total Sulfur 0.03 0.11 <br />Acid-Base Potential (-) +10.9 +52.43 <br />Molybdenum 0.015 0.079 <br />Boron 0.10 0.35 <br />K (meg/I in sat ext) 0.62 0.50 <br />(1) A, B, C, D and E pit topsoil 1985-1989. <br />(2) B, C, D and E pit overburden 1985-1989. <br />(3) ppm unless other denoted. <br />Note: See successive annual reports (Appendix W) for additional information. <br />~~-3. _-_-~---_--_:_:-_- <br />2-361 e ~ I <br />r:FVISION %PPRDVED ~! <br />i ~ PATE ~-~q-93 .I <br />