My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-04-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2009076 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2009076
>
2009-04-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2009076 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:45:43 PM
Creation date
12/10/2010 1:36:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009076
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
4/20/2009
Doc Name
Declaratory Order Presentation- Part 1
From
Venture Resources
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Gen. Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REGIONAL JOINT SYSTEM <br />Four sets of joints are almost uniformly present in all rocks except the Tertiary porphyries and are <br />remarkably consistent in attitude despite differences in Precambrian structure. These sets, termed the "regional- <br />joint system," are summarized in figure 4, a stereodiagram that was constructed from the regional joint maxima <br />on Schmidt contour diagrams of joints in the Idaho Springs district. The prevalence of these joint sets <br />throughout the Idaho Springs and surrounding areas, the angular relations between the sets, and the fact that <br />they intersect on a nearly common line suggest that they are genetically related to one another. The regional <br />joint system in turn shows systematic relations to the broad archlike form of the Front Range. <br />The uplift and arching of the Front Range in Paleozoic and Laramide times (Lovering and Goddard, <br />1950, p. 57-63) are recognized major disturbances after the emplacement of the biotite-muscovite granite to <br />which the regional joint system might logically be related. The Laramide arching was the more pronounced of <br />the two disturbances. This and the fact that the geometric relation of the regional joint sets to the known shape <br />of the Laramide arch is similar to relations shown between joints and folds elsewhere (Harrison and Moench, <br />1961, fig. 8) indicate that the arch and the regional joint system are genetically related. The arch trends about N. <br />15° W. near the Idaho Springs district; accordingly, the joint set that strikes N. 19° W. is called the "regional <br />longitudinal set" because it is subparallel to the arch. The arch disappears southward near Cripple Creek, Colo., <br />which indicates that it plunges gently southward. A set of cross joints related to the arch should dip steeply <br />north and strike east-northeast; accordingly, the set that strikes N. 70° E. and dips steeply north is termed the <br />"regional cross joint set" So-called diagonal joints are common in folded areas. Ideally, two sets are present, in <br />each, the acute angle of intersection is bisected by the cross joints and the obtuse angle of intersection is <br />bisected by the trend of the folds. The regional cross joint set shown in figure 4 bisects the acute angle between <br />two intersecting sets, which are accordingly termed the "regional diagonal joint sets." <br />The regional joint system probably formed as a result of the Laramide arching of the Front Range <br />under compressional stresses that were oriented east-northeast. The two diagonal joint sets have the position of <br />shear fractures for such a stress system and probably originated by shear. The cross joint set has the position of <br />tension fractures for this stress system and may have originated by elongation or bending of the axis of the arch. <br />Tension fractures may also form approximately parallel to the axial plane of a fold owing to the stretching of <br />layers across the top of the fold, and they may form owing to the release of the principal stress. The regional <br />longitudinal joint set may have originated in both ways. (See Harrison and Moench (1961) for a review of the <br />joints expected on folds.) <br />GEOLOGIC HISTORY SUMMARIZED <br />In Precambrian time a thick sequence of sedimentary rocks was deeply depressed into the earth's crust; <br />it recrystallized at high temperatures and pressures and was intensely deformed. The rocks were deformed <br />plastically into large, mainly open folds whose axes trend north to northeast. Concurrently, small bodies of <br />granodiorite, quartz diorite, and quartz gabbro were emplaced, recrystallized, and slightly deformed after they <br />solidified. Small bodies of biotite-muscovite granite probably were emplaced late in this early deformation - <br />apparently early enough to form phacoliths in folds of this deformation but too late to be deformed or <br />recrystallized. <br />After an interval of deep erosion, the rocks were deformed again. This younger Precambrian <br />deformation was largely restricted to the narrow Idaho Springs-Ralston shear zone which extends at least 20 <br />miles northeast and a few miles southwest of the Idaho Springs district. Within this zone, which is about 2 miles <br />wide in the Idaho Springs district, pervasive granulation and folding were superposed on the previously folded <br />rocks. <br />Probably in late Precambrian time the through-going northwest-trending Idaho Springs fault, the J. L. <br />Emerson-Gem fault system, and some smaller faults formed. A few relatively flat-lying faults and some steep <br />north-trending faults may also have had their inception at this time, although their main movements came much <br />later. <br />• <br />17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.