Laserfiche WebLink
between these sets of faults can be seen (fig. 3). Faults of both sets are nearly vertical in the central part of the <br />district, but, northwestward, the dips flatten to as low as 30° to the north. <br />Displacements have been observed in many mines and are consistently right lateral. The largest <br />apparent displacement was observed in the Bald Eagle mine, where the Precambrian rocks on the northwest side <br />of the fault have been shifted about 80 feet northeast relative to those on the southeast side. Most of the <br />slickenside striae are subhorizontal, which is evidence in support of the inferred dominant strike-slip <br />movements. Downdip slickenside striae commonly cross the subhorizontal striae, and the latest formed sulfides <br />commonly thicken in pods on the steeper parts of veins. This would indicate that slight normal downdip <br />movement on many faults took place at a late stage of mineralization. <br />The east-, east-northeast-, and northeast-trending Laramide faults show evidence of repeated <br />movement. Relatively early movements preceded mineralization and produced the channelways for the pre- <br />forming fluid. Later movements accompanied and followed mineralization, for sulfide and gangue minerals are <br />commonly brecciated and cemented by later sulfide and gangue minerals. In many places postmineralization <br />gouge coats the vein walls. <br />A few nearly vertical north-striking faults that are grouped near the center of the district (fig. 3 ) <br />probably formed last, for they cut several northeast- and east-northeast-trending faults. Evidently, the north- <br />trending faults also postdate much of the sulfide mineralization, for they are characteristically lined with white <br />clay gouge that contains pulverized sulfides that where probably dragged from the older faults. <br />ORIGIN OF THE FAULTS <br />The extensive through-going northwest-striking faults contrast sharply with faults that trend east, east- <br />northeast, and northeast; they probably were formed much earlier and under a different stress system. The stress <br />system is not understood, but the great extent of the northwest-striking faults (L.overing and Goddard, 1950, pl. <br />• 1), indicate that the stresses must have affected much of the Front Range. Although the northwest-trending <br />faults show evidence of repeated movements, their inception was probably during Precambrian time (Tweto and <br />Sims, 1963). <br />Some flat-dipping faults that strike east to northeast, and some faults that strike north or north- <br />northeast in parts of the Front Range - possibly including the Idaho Springs district - may also have formed in <br />Precambrian time. Evidence for this interpretation was summarized by Sims and others (1963, p. 16-17), but we <br />did not find such evidence in the Idaho Springs district where the north-trending faults cut some of the other <br />Laramide faults and lack any indication of previous movement. The flat-dipping faults differ in no major <br />respects, other than angle of dip, from the other east-, east- northeast-, and northeast-striking faults. Further, <br />many steep faults flatten in depth, and many flat faults steepen; this indicates that the apparently flat and <br />apparently steep breaks do not differ genetically. For these reasons the flat-dipping and the north-trending faults <br />are grouped with the Laramide faults in this report. <br />Most of the Laramide faults appear to have formed after the emplacement of the quartz bostonite <br />porphyry but before the biotite-quartz latite. In places outside the Idaho Springs district, the east-, east- <br />northeast-, and northeast-striking faults formed in a definite sequence, but the fact that this sequence reverses <br />locally suggests that the three sets of faults all formed over a short period of time. This apparently short period <br />of time and the consistent movement patterns of the fault sets indicate that they are a conjugate shear system. <br />The east-trending faults show left-lateral offset, the east-northeast-, and northeast-trending faults show right- <br />lateral offset, and all three sets may have formed by shear stress related to compressive stress that was oriented <br />east-northeast. <br />The few north-trending faults formed slightly later than the main network of Laramide faults, and their <br />origin is less certain. These faults are similar in orientation but are en echelon to the Precambrian (?) Dory Hill <br />fault of the Central City district. (See Sims and others, 1963, fig. 6.) Conceivably, these faults may have formed <br />by a reactivation of the Dory Hill fault during the Laramide orogeny. <br />• <br />15