My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-03_REVISION - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2010-12-03_REVISION - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:34 PM
Creation date
12/6/2010 8:36:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/3/2010
Doc Name
2nd Response to Adequacy Comments
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
PR2
Email Name
SB1
SLB
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />'DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 C O L O R A D O <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 o t v i s o N o f <br />RECLAMATION <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 MINING <br /> <br /> SAFETY <br />December 3, 2010 Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Mike King <br />Mr. Roy Karo Executive Director <br />Seneca Coal Company, LLC Loretta E. Pineda <br />37796 Routt County Road 53 Director <br />P.O. Box 670 <br />Hayden CO 81639 <br />RE: Seneca II Mine (Permit No. C-198-005) <br />Permit Revision Application No. 2 <br />Reduced Permit Area <br />2"d Response to Adequacy Comments <br />Dear Mr. Karo: <br />The Division has reviewed your November 26, 2010 response to our October 27, 2010 adequacy <br />review letter for PR-2 at the Seneca II Mine. The October 27, 2010 letter identified four remaining <br />concerns with the revision application. The information provided by SCC satisfied all of our adequacy <br />concerns, with the exception of one item requiring additional clarification. <br />14a. Page 2.05.4-2 was revised, as requested by the Division, but there is one section of the text that <br />is still somewhat confusing. The last sentence of the third paragraph under the heading <br />"2.05.4(2)(e)(vi) Determining Revegetation Success", states that "Sampling and statistical <br />methods and success criteria for vegetation cover for Phase II bond release are consistent with <br />the methods and criteria described for Phase III bond release, with the exception that vegetation <br />cover success for Phase II release requires only a single year." Please revise the sentence to <br />read "...requires data for only a single year." <br />Should you have any questions, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />Susan L. Burgmaier <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Sandy Brown, DRMS <br />Dan Mathews, DRMS <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.