My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-30_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2010-11-30_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:21 PM
Creation date
12/2/2010 3:53:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
11/30/2010
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
CAM-Colorado, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM- Colorado, LLC <br />November 30, 2010 <br />Rule 2.05.4(1) Reclamation Plan <br />Page 18 <br />64. In the first paragraph of this section, CAM says the land will be returned to an industrial <br />and wildlife habitat land use. In Section (2)(d) of this section (third paragraph), CAM <br />says the postmining land use will be rangeland and wildlife habitat. Revegetation success <br />standards are based on the postmining land use, so it is important to be consistent. <br />Please clarify the postmining land use and be consistent throughout the permit. <br />65. The application states that approximately 70,000 cubic yards of fill will be imported to <br />construct the rail spur, rail loop and haul road and that this overburden material will be <br />obtained from a permitted gravel pit. The Division has received documentation <br />indicating this material will come from the adjacent parcel owned by Tavistock Partners, <br />LLC, which is not a permitted gravel pit. Tavistock requested a determination from the <br />Division regarding the necessity of obtaining a reclamation permit for the proposed <br />excavation location of material intended to be utilized as fill for the coal loadout <br />facilities. The Division's minerals section determined that the proposed operation would <br />need a reclamation permit. Tavistock challenged the Division's decision and requested a <br />Declaratory Order from the Mined Land Reclamation Board (Board) exempting the <br />proposed operation from the need to obtain a reclamation permit. A declaratory order <br />hearing was scheduled for the November 17, 2010 meeting of the Board. However, <br />Tavistock and the Division mutually agreed to continue this hearing to the December <br />Board meeting to allow for additional research to be conducted into the need for a <br />reclamation permit (Construction Materials, Coal, or a combination) for this borrow site <br />location. On page 2.05 -28 CAM states "Most of the imported fill will be obtained from <br />an adjacent DMRS permitted gravel pit." Please clarify this statement and identify in the <br />application the permitted pit including name, location and DRMS Permit Number. Also <br />please note that DRMS is incorrectly spelled on this page of the application. <br />Rule 2.05.4(2)(d ) Removal,_ Storage and Redistribution of Topsoil, Subsoil, and Other Material <br />66. The applicant plans to replace topsoil to an approximate 6" thickness on the areas from <br />which it was salvaged. Narrative in the text section indicates that regraded surfaces will be <br />ripped prior to topsoil replacement, "if necessary to relieve compaction ". Given the heavy <br />textured subsoils and extent of compaction that will occur within the facilities area, ripping <br />will be warranted. Please clarify that "ripping to a minimum 2 foot depth will be employed <br />on regraded surfaces prior to topsoil replacement ". <br />Rule 2.05.4(2)(e) Reve etation PIan <br />67. Narrative regarding the schedule of revegetation indicates that the time frame for <br />revegetation could vary from as little as five years to more than 10 years. The intended <br />meaning of this statement is not clear. Please provide language to clarify that permanent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.