My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-30_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2010-11-30_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:21 PM
Creation date
12/2/2010 3:53:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
11/30/2010
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
CAM-Colorado, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM - Colorado, LLC <br />November 30, 2010 <br />Page 14 <br />included in the permit application, to provide definitive documentation. Please provide <br />necessary documentation for inclusion in the application. <br />Rule 2.05.2 Operation Plan — Operation Description <br />43. Please change the word "aerial" to "areal" in Section 2.05.2(2), page 2.05 -land in the <br />Clean Coal Storage Pile paragraph on page 2.05 -6. <br />Rule 2.05.3 Operation Plan — Permit Area <br />44. Page 2.05 -3 — the section title, "205.3 Operation Plan — Permit Area" is missing from this <br />page. <br />45. Page 2.05 -4 —please delete "Underground Mining" from the title of (2) Operation <br />description. <br />Rule 2.05.3(3) Mine Facilities <br />46. Section 2.05.3(3)(a) and (c) discuss the proposed mine facilities. For each facility listed, <br />please identify the map or maps on which the facility is depicted. <br />47. Under Rule 2.05.3(3)(c) and referring to Map 16, " Loadout Facilities ", please explain why <br />CAM has elected to make the entire railroad loop drainage report to sediment ponds. It <br />appears to the Division that the portion of the railroad loop not adjacent to the loadout <br />facilities disturbance could be considered as a haul road not in the disturbed area as defined <br />in Rule 4.05.2(4) and, therefore, falls under Rule 4.03.1(4)(iv), similar to the situation with <br />the railroad spur. If changes are made to the sediment control system, please revise the <br />discussions concerning the sediment control system found throughout the permit <br />application. <br />48. On permit text page 2.05 -11 in Section 2.05.3(3)(c), it is stated that haul road no. I is not <br />within the disturbed area. This is in compliance with Rules 4.05.2(4) and 4.03.1(4)(a)(iv). <br />As such, only best management practices are required for sediment control for haul road <br />no. 1. However, there are four Sedcad hydrology designs for the silt fence along haul road <br />no. 1 that are presented in Exhibit 9 of Volume II. These four designs are not needed and <br />they can be omitted. <br />49. Please provide a more detailed description in Section 2.05.3(3)(c) on permit text page 2.05- <br />9 and in Section 2.05.6(2)(a)(i) on permit text page 2.05 -43 that describes the sediment <br />control and coal spillage control that will be utilized in the construction and operational use <br />of the Reed Wash bridge. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.