Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Jared Dains Page 2 <br />November 23, 2010 <br />According to the Applicant, the distance from the surface of the exposed ground water area to <br />the Cache La Poudre River was measured based on the down gradient extent of the exposed <br />ground water surface (nearest point). For purposes of this SWSP, the method used to measure <br />the distance to estimate the lagged depletions will be accepted, however any future SWSP must <br />measure the distance from the exposed ground water surface area to the Cache La Poudre <br />River based on the centroid of the exposed ground water surface. <br />Computation of evaporation under this plan was reduced during the ice covered period. <br />You have assumed the ice covered period to occur during the months of December and January <br />based on the average monthly temperatures of 29.4°F for December, and 28.6°F for January. <br />Temperature data were obtained from the Greeley UNC weather station (053553) for the time <br />period of 1967 through 2005. The ice covered periods may be used to reduce the amount of <br />evaporative losses that need to be replaced; however, for the purpose of this SWSP, the Applicant <br />shall replace the net evaporation depletions from the exposed ground water surface area that may <br />occur during the assumed ice covered period (December and January) for any time that the pit is <br />not completely covered by ice. <br />Computation of the net evaporation during any time that the pit is not completely covered by <br />ice shall be determined as the pro-rata amount of the monthly gross evaporation rate distribution <br />amount identified in the State Engineer's General Guidelines for Substitute Supply Plans for Sand <br />and Gravel Pits, subtracting the pro-rata amount of the effective precipitation for that period. The <br />attached Table 1 identifies the estimated monthly depletions from evaporation. <br />You have provided a monthly breakdown of the annual depletions totaling 49.14 acre-feet of <br />evaporative loss from 17.81 acre of exposed surface area, 4.51 acre-feet of water used and <br />consumed for dust control, and 0.74 acre-feet of water lost with 50,000 tons of mined product. <br />Prior to dewatering, the material to be mined was located below the water table; however since this <br />site has been dewatered, the material to be mined will be in a dewatered state. Since the material <br />will not be washed, pursuant to the State E'ngineer's Guidelines for Substitute Water Supply Plan <br />for Sand and Gravel Pits, the assumed moisture content is 2% by weight. The estimated monthly <br />depletions due to operational losses are shown on the attached Table 2. <br />Replacements <br />The sources of replacement water to be used for this SWSP are: 1) consumptive use <br />credits associated with the historical irrigation use of five shares of the Greeley Irrigation Company <br />("GIC"), 2) a lease of 12.9 acre-feet of augmentation water provided by the Platte River Power <br />Authority, and 3) a lease of 1.3 acre-feet of augmentation water provided by the City of Greeley. <br />In accordance with the letter dated April 30, 2010 (copy attached) from the Colorado <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety ("DRMS"), all sand and gravel mining operators <br />must comply with the requirements of the Colorado Reclamation Act and the Mineral Rules <br />and Regulations for the protection of water resources. The April 30, 2010 letter from DRMS <br />requires that you provide information to DRMS to demonstrate you can replace long term <br />injurious stream depletions that result from mining related exposure of ground water. The <br />DRMS letter identifies four approaches to satisfy this requirement. The 4t' approach <br />requires documentation to identify what water rights or other permanent water source will