My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-22_REVISION - M2009023 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2009023
>
2010-11-22_REVISION - M2009023 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:18:42 PM
Creation date
11/29/2010 9:30:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009023
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/22/2010
Doc Name
Army Corps Permit
From
Department of the Army
To
La Plata Water Conservancy District
Type & Sequence
AR1
Email Name
KAP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
intended as part of the agency action is not considered to be prohibited taking under the Act <br />provided that such taking is in compliance with the terms and conditions of this incidental take <br />statement. <br />The measures described below are nondiscretionary, and must be undertaken so that they become <br />binding conditions of any Federal discretionary activity, for the exemption in section 7(o)(2) to <br />apply. The participating Federal Agencies have a continuing duty to monitor the activity <br />covered by this incidental take statement. If the Recovery Program, l) fails to assume and <br />implement the terms and conditions or 2) fails to retain oversight to ensure compliance with the <br />terms and conditions, the protective coverage of section 7(o)(2) may lapse for the projects <br />covered by this incidental take, statement. <br />The Service anticipates that take in the form of harm will occur in association with current and <br />future water depletions. Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker are harmed from the <br />reduction of water in their habitats resulting from the project in the following manner: 1) <br />individuals using habitats diminished by the proposed water depletions could be more <br />susceptible to predation and competition from nonnative fish; 2) habitat conditions may be . <br />rendered unsuitable for breeding and raising of young because reduced flows?vould impact <br />habitat formulation and maintenance as described in the biological opinion. <br />Water depletions cause incidental take in the form of harm by reducing habitat availability and <br />habitat maintenance capability of the San Juan River as described in the "effects of the action" <br />section in the accompanying biological opinion. Estimating the number of individuals of these <br />species that would be taken as a result of water depletions is difficult to quantify for the <br />following reasons: 1) determining whether an individual failed to breed as a result of water <br />depletions versus natural causes would be extremely difficult to determine; 2) finding a dead or <br />injured listed fish would be difficult, due to the large size of the action area and because <br />carcasses are subject to scavenging; 3) natural fluctuations in river flows and species abundance <br />may mask project effects; and 4) effects that reduce fecundity are difficult to quantify. <br />According to Service policy, as stated in the Endangered Species Consultation Handbook (March <br />1998) (Handbook), some detectable measure of effect should be provided, such as the relative <br />occurrence of the species or a surrogate species in the local community, or amount of habitat <br />used by the species, to serve as a measure for take. Take also may be expressed as a change in <br />habitat characteristics affecting the species, such as water quality or flow (Handbook, p 4-47 to <br />4-48). Because estimating the number of individuals of the two listed fishes that could be taken <br />by the water depletions addressed in this biological opinion is difficult, we have developed a <br />surrogate measure to estimate the amount of anticipate take to listed fish in the form of harm. <br />The surrogate we are using is the reduction of water that would occur from the proposed action. <br />We exempt all take in the form of harm that would occur from the removal of an average of <br />1,535 acre-feet of future water depletions annually. Water depletions above the amount <br />addressed in this biological opinion would exceed the anticipated level of incidental take and are <br />not exempt from the prohibitions of section 9 of the Act. <br />The implementation of all the Recovery Program elements, including implementing the flow <br />recommendations, is intended to minimize impacts of water depletions and therefore, the <br />implementation of the Recovery Program will serve as reasonable and prudent measures for <br />28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.