My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2010-11-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:46 PM
Creation date
11/26/2010 1:47:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/12/2010
Doc Name
pages 4-222aa to 4-233r
Section_Exhibit Name
4.8 Hydrologic Impacts Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />increased in TDS, sulfate and other major constituents in 1983. This increase is <br />likely the result of water that has been in the Spoil aquifer for a longer period of <br />time before reaching this spring. The concentrations in 1983, 1984 and 1985 are <br />likely the maximum concentrations that this seep will yield. The 1986 <br />concentrations indicate that the levels in this seep are starting to decline. The <br />major constituent concentrations from the Cottonwood Spring, which has not existed <br />as long as the Colt Seep, contains concentrations that are much lower than those <br />from the Colt Seep, except for chloride and bicarbonate. The lower concentrations <br />from the Cottonwood Spring are probably representative of this portion of the Spoil <br />aquifer and, therefore, will never reach the levels observed from the Colt Seep. <br />The concentrations from backfill well GF5 are similar to those from the Cottonwood <br />Spring which indicate that these values may be more typical of the Spoil aquifer. <br />• The concentrations from the Cottonwood Spring are representative of the values <br />in the surface water during low flow conditions when all of the surface water is <br />derived from ground-water discharge. The concentrations from Colt Seep are higher <br />than the typical low flow concentrations, but the discharge from this seep is too <br />small to impact surface-water quality. The average ground-water quality being <br />discharged to the surface is expected to contain higher concentrations during the <br />initial several years after mining and, therefore, increase the concentrations <br />slightly. The discharge from the more permeable areas of the Spoil aquifer will <br />yield the majority of the input to surface water and monitoring indicates this <br />quality should be close to the natural ground water being discharged in this area. <br />Therefore, the impact to surface-water quality from Spoil aquifer discharge to the <br />surface is expected to be small. <br />r <br />LJ <br />4-227a REVISED JAN 7 '88
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.