My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2010-11-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:46 PM
Creation date
11/26/2010 1:47:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/12/2010
Doc Name
Rangeland, Cropland, Wildlife Mitigation & Air Pollution Control Plan
From
pages 4-101 to 4-171
Section_Exhibit Name
4.4 through 4.7
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
treatments discussed earlier should help draw the animals away from the revege- <br /> tated areas. In addition, the seeding of shrubs between clumps or strips of <br /> mature shrubs may be delayed until an area of at least 200 contiguous acres are <br /> ready for seeding. This will dilute the impact of wildlife use and promote the <br /> survival potential of shrubs. Plummer et al. (1968) reported that if 500 or <br /> more acres were reseeded at a time on big. game range in Utah that the use was <br /> sufficiently diluted to allow plants to establish. For the Trapper "mine, it <br /> would take too long for 500 contiguous acres to become available. Moreover, s ome <br /> protection will be afforded seedlings during critical use periods by the s now <br /> that generally accumulates on the north facing slope on which Trapper Mine is <br /> located. Therefore, the 200 acre criteria in combination with improvements to <br /> draw animals away from newly revegetated areas is considered a reasonable s ite <br /> specific compromise. <br />If however, depredation of newly revegetated areas becomes too severe, deer and <br />elk restrictive fencing or repellents will be considered to protect the critical <br />revegetated areas. Before implementation of these measures, plans and informa- <br />tion will be provided to the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division for consul- <br />tation, <br />Watering Sites <br />As mining progresses, stockwater ponds currently established within the mining <br />area will be destroyed. These ponds coupled with a few springs and seeps are <br />important watering areas for deer and elk during the summer and fall months. <br />Reestablishment of stockwater ponds is discussed in Section 4.2.2 of the applica- <br />tion while reestablishment of springs and seeps is discussed in Section 4.8. <br />Sediment control ponds, which are in existence during the mining operation, pro- <br />vide new and useful interim watering sites for animals during mining. <br />4.6.2.2 Game Birds <br />Sage Grouse <br />The sage grouse (Centrocercus uronhasianus) population within the mine plan is <br />0111 0 relatively small with no strutting grounds located within the mine plan area <br />(Section 2.4). Sage grouse will suffer some loss of. habitat due to mining and <br />4-158 21982
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.