Laserfiche WebLink
November 8, 20 10 C-1981-010/Trapper Mine <br />RDZ <br />Inspection Topic Summary <br />NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br />N - Air Resource Protection N -Roads <br />N - Availability of Records R - Reclamation Success <br />N - Backfill & Grading N - Revegetation <br />N - Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste NA - Subsidence <br />N - Explosives N - Slides and Other Damage <br />N - Fish & Wildlife N - Support Facilities On-site <br />R - Hydrologic Balance - N -Signs and Markers <br />N - Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan NA - Support Facilities Not On-site <br />NA - Other NA - Special Categories Of Mining <br />NA - Processing Waste N -Topsoil <br />COMMENTS <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, <br />4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water <br />Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage - Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; <br />Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />A contour ditch near the north end of the parcel did not appear to have positive drainage. However, it was <br />determined that the problem is not severe enough to warrant re-construction of the ditch. Graham Roberts was <br />advised that it would be prudent to occasionally inspect the area to make sure that the ditch is operating as <br />designed. <br />RECLAMATION SUCCESS - Rule 4.15, Rule 3: <br />Block F-AB-08 was inspected to determine if gullies and contour ditches were repaired. All gullies had <br />been repaired by grading them, laying brush over the disturbed soil, and seeding the areas. Per Graham Roberts, <br />the work was completed approximately a month before this inspection. <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Page 2 of 4