My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-08_INSPECTION - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-11-08_INSPECTION - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:36 PM
Creation date
11/9/2010 7:22:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
11/8/2010
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DRMS
To
Cotter Corporation
Inspection Date
9/9/2010
Email Name
DB2
AJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M-1977-300 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 09 September 2010 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: DRZ <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was conducted by Tony Waldron and David Bird of DRMS with the primary purpose of examining <br />the water treatment system that had been installed in accordance with Technical Revision 12. Representing the <br />operator on the inspection were John Hamrick and Randy Whicker. Also attending the inspection were Roy Laws, <br />John Moody, and Patrick O'Connell of Jefferson County. Duane Bollig of WRT (Water Remediation Technology, <br />LLQ was on site and provided a tour of the water treatment facility. <br />The treatment system is located inside the building that housed the former water treatment system. The system <br />consists of a series of four down-flow vessels holding anion exchange columns containing WRT's proprietary <br />uranium-specific media Z-92. Mr. Bollig explained that each of the four vessels can hold several hundred pounds <br />of uranium when fully loaded, and one column can last about six months. The system is currently treating ground <br />water pumped from Sump One, Sump Four, and monitoring well MW-9, at a rate of about 100 gpm. Other than <br />some incidental removal of accessory anions such as sulfate, the system is only designed to remove uranium. <br />Thus, other potentially problematic constituents that are not removed by this system could be discharged to <br />Ralston Creek. An example is sulfate, which was being released at a concentration of 560 mg/L as shown on the <br />attached laboratory report. The piping network for the system is currently above ground, and efforts are planned <br />to bury the piping in the near future in advance of freezing temperatures. Ralston Creek adjacent to the mine site <br />is now dry except for a few areas of standing water, so the treatment system currently discharges to a dry <br />streambed. The operator reports that the current conditions are typical of most years; the creek is dry adjacent to <br />the mine facility but gains flow below the property boundary. <br />Also during the inspection the operator showed the Division a newly discovered pipe that was sticking from the <br />ground just south of the storm water retention pond. The operator reported in letters dated 3 September 2010 and <br />24 September 2010 that the site environmental technician first observed the pipe discharging during a field <br />investigation the morning of 20 July 2010. The rate of discharge was estimated at about 2 gpm. Photographs <br />taken months earlier indicated that the pipe was not previously discharging, so this is believed to be a recent <br />development. Samples collected by Cotter indicating a uranium concentration of 20-25 mg/L, along with trilinear <br />plots done by the operator indicating comparable major ion ratios, lead them to believe that the discharge <br />originated from the mine pool. They were able to stop the flow by raising the end of the pipe a few feet. The pipe <br />was not flowing during the inspection, and the operator postulated that the cessation of flow may be related to a <br />recent drop in the mine pool level, which is monitored continuously. If this discharge were permanent, it would <br />likely require reporting under the emergency provisions of Hard Rock Rule 8.1. However, since the operator is <br />able to stop the flow, adverse impacts to human health, property, or the environment do not appear imminent. <br />The operator has not yet started pumping and treating the mine pool as ordered by the Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board in their Order of 11 August 2010. The operators made a noteworthy comment pertaining to the elevation <br />of the mine pool. They said that the level of the mine pool was now only about 15 feet below the level of the <br />Steve and Pierce adits, which represents a rise of a few feet after several months of stasis. <br />& E Contact Address <br />NAME: <br />OPERATOR: <br />STREET: <br />Gus Gaviotis <br />Cotter Corporation <br />7800 E. Dorado Place, Suite 210 <br />CITY/STATE/ZIP: Englewood. CO 80111 <br />F BLM <br />F USFS <br />F HW <br />r HMWMD <br />F OSE <br />F WQCD (Mike Harris) <br />F OTHER (Denver Water, <br />Arvada Water, Table Mtn <br />Water, JeffCo)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.