My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-04_REVISION - C1981008 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-11-04_REVISION - C1981008 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:32 PM
Creation date
11/8/2010 11:35:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/4/2010
Doc Name
Objections to PR6 Request Formal Hearing Altogether
From
JoEllen Turner & Michael Morgan and Other Parties
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
SB1
MLT
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
days after the informal public hearing and the ones who participated in this hearing was allowed <br />an additional 20 days to comment. Letters received after that period of time are not legitimate <br />letters. Letters from Western Fuels employees who were told that they had to write letters that <br />the properties were put back as good as they were and have their wives sign then a couple of <br />months ago, are not following the rules and regulations, even though they are not there either at <br />this time. <br />We will be submitting additional information throughout this comment period. There are many <br />more people who wish to sign the objection letter, but will not be on this first notebook sent. <br />There will be tapes that will be submitted as well as soil sample results. There will be letters <br />from other soil scientist and schools of studies regarding prime farmland. We will try and have <br />all information submitted prior to the November meeting. <br />Thank you for your time and patience and for taking out of your own time to try and come to an <br />accurate decision. We are again asking for the withdrawal of this permit revision as it written <br />and the contents that are not factual. We do not want the facts covered and swept under a table, <br />we want accurate documentation and the Colorado Regulatory Program to do the job that it was <br />designed for. It is a good program and was designed to implement, enforce, and maintain it's <br />approved State Program as provided in the Act.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.