My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-08-13_PERMIT FILE - M2002004 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-08-13_PERMIT FILE - M2002004 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:43 PM
Creation date
11/3/2010 9:46:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
8/13/2002
Doc Name
Recommendation for Approval of a 112 Construction Application
From
DRMS
To
GCC Rio Grande, Inc.
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
away" (5 to 13 feet in this instance). The Division considers it is extremely <br />unlikely that damage to an aquifer 450 feet below the blasted sequence will <br />occur. If it does occur, the wells that would be affected would likely be those <br />belonging to GCC Rio Grande, located nearer than the Blake Ranch well. <br />AQUIFERS The Dakota aquifer is approximately 450 feet below the Fort <br />Hayes Limestone, the targeted formation. The Cheyenne aquifer is below the <br />Dakota. Blasting in the pit is not expected to affect either aquifer, as the forces <br />of explosion are primarily transmitted toward the `free face" and upward from <br />the borehole containing explosives. While vibrations will be transmitted <br />downward, the confining force of the rock overlying the Dakota aquifer will not <br />allow fractures to open or any offset to develop in the Dakota aquifer. <br />Therefore the proposed operation is not anticipated to cause damage to the <br />Dakota Aquifer. <br />The above two explanations above also answer the question of damage to the <br />shale layer underlying the Saint Charles River. It is extremely unlikely that the <br />Saint Charles alluvial aquifer can be affected by the blasting operation. <br />The applicant has complied with the requirements of Rule 6.5(4). <br />IV. ISSUES NOT TO BE CONSIDERED <br />All other issues raised by the parties that are not included in the list above will not <br />be considered by the Board, either because the concern has been addressed or <br />because the issue is outside the jurisdiction and authority of the Board under the <br />Construction Materials Act. <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.