My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-10-28_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-10-28_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:16 PM
Creation date
11/2/2010 2:53:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
10/28/2010
Doc Name
DRMS Response to Cotter Answer to 9/16/10 Notice
From
DRMS
To
HRO
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />cotter <br />VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL <br />August 2:3,2010 <br />Mr. Anthony J. Waldron <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 30203 <br />Re: Schwartzwalder Mine, Permit No. M-1977-300; Corrective Actions 2 g 3 of the August <br />11, 2010 Mined Land Reclamation Board Order <br />Dear Mr. Waldron: <br />This letter respectfully responds to your August 13, 2010 letter. stating that plans for addressing <br />items 2 and 3 of the August 11, 2010 Mined Land Reclamation Board Order ("Order") must be <br />submitted as a teclulical revision to the permit by August 23, 2010. <br />The Order specifically states that "[a]ny party to a hearing may petition the Board to reconsider <br />its decision. Please refer to Hard Rock Rule 2.9 for guidelines, time limits, Fn1d procedures for <br />filing a Petition for Reconsideration." Pursuant to this provision of the Order, Cotter Corporation <br />(N.S.L.) ("Cotter") plans to petition for reconsideration. Therefore, it is inappropriate for the <br />Division to request a technical revision. <br />In addition, the Order says nothing about requiring a technical revision, defined as "a change in <br />the permit or an application, which does not have more than a minor effect upon the approved or <br />proposed Reclamation or Environmental Protection Plan." See 2 CCR 407-1 Rule 1.1 (52). As <br />Cotter has consistently stated on numerous occasions, the definition of a technical revision clearly <br />does not cover mine dewatering and treatment, and Cotter remains opposed to this corrective <br />action for the reasons set forth in its submissions and its testimony at the hearing. <br />Please contact inc at 719-275-7413 (ext. 202) if -vou have questions. <br />Very truly yours. <br />John S. Hamrick <br />Vice President, Mill Operations <br />Cotter Corporation EXHIBIT 2 <br />Telephone (719) 275-7413 <br />Canor, City Mill, P.O. Box 1750, Canon City, CO 812115-1750 USA Fax 1719? 275.1669
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.