Laserfiche WebLink
Require- <br /> ment <br />Requirement Regulation complied Comment <br /> with? <br /> (yes / not <br /> The post-mining uses of ground water in the permit area will be <br /> irrigation and livestock uses. Only the three large sandstone <br /> aquifers within the upper Williams Fork Formation at Trapper <br /> (Twenty Mile Sandstone, Second White Sandstone, and Third <br /> White Sandstone) could reasonably be expected to yield enough <br /> high quality water to serve as a local supply source. Coal aquifers <br /> in the area possess neither the deliverability nor water quality to be <br /> considered for reliable water supplies. <br /> The Twenty Mile Sandstone is the only regionally extensive <br /> aquifer in the vicinity of the Trapper Mine. It is several hundred <br /> feet deeper than the deepest mining at Trapper and has shown no <br /> effect from Trapper's mining based on monitoring data from well <br /> GF-1 and previously from well GD-1(2). <br /> The Second and Third White Sandstone aquifers overlie the <br /> stratigraphic sequence being mined at Trapper. TDS <br />U. Prevention of concentrations in both of these aquifers have increased over the <br />impacts to ground past several years based on monitoring of wells P-5 and P-8, which <br />water that CDRMS are in the East Pyeatt Gulch basin. Water from both wells, <br /> <br />adversely impact regulations <br />yes however, remains suitable for use by livestock and wildlife (see <br /> <br />the postmining 4.05.1(2) and discussion in item L. above). <br /> <br />land use within 4.05.11 <br />Trapper believes the TDS and conductivity concentrations will <br />the permit area eventually subside, possibly hundreds of years after mining and <br /> reclamation, as discussed in Section 4.8.3 of the permit. The <br /> suitability of Trapper's ground water for livestock and wildlife is <br /> expected to continue into the future based on long-term trends in <br /> Trapper's water quality data. <br /> In 2009, as well as in previous years, elevated levels of TDS <br /> were detected in wells GF-7 and GF-11 (spoil backfill) and in <br /> well P-8 (the Third White Sandstone). These have been <br /> determined to be local impacts that do not impair potential use. <br /> Elevated TDS levels in well P-8 may be the result of spoil <br /> leachate discharging from A-pit, which is 1,100feet upgradient <br /> from the well, or they may be due to surface impacts, given that <br /> the well is only 35 feet deep and the well is completed in <br /> sandstone beds that are likely highly permeable. Furthermore, <br /> high nitrate content of samples in past years may indicate the <br /> well receives infiltration of surface water. <br />V. Minimization of <br />disturbance to the CDRMS <br />hydrologic regulation yes <br />balance within 4.05.1(1) <br />and adjacent to <br />the permit area <br />W. Prevention of <br />material damage CDRMS The only apparent significant impact to surface water outside the <br />to the hydrologic regulation yes permit area has been TDS loading of surface streams, and this <br /> <br />balance outside <br />4.05.1(1) impact has not impaired water use. There are no data indicating <br /> impacts to an aquifer outside the permit area. <br />the ermit area <br />Page 5