Laserfiche WebLink
and have been requested as permanent structures by the land owner and the grazing <br />leaseholder". The reference to Appendix 13-11A was erroneous, it should have been <br />Appendix 13-12A "Landowner Requests for Permanent Structures". The Division requested <br />that if a letter from the State Land Board had been provided regarding the permanent fencing <br />(pasture boundary and CSU shrub plots), it should be provided for inclusion in the Appendix <br />and the Appendix should be referenced in the PR-2 narrative on page 2.05.3-2. Alternatively, <br />if such letter has not been provided from the State Land Board, the Division requested that PR- <br />2 narrative on page 2.05.3-2 be amended to state that such letter would be provided prior to <br />submittal of application for Phase III bond release. <br />SCC's response to this item suggested that the Division refer to Appendix 13-12A in the <br />original PAP. We have checked Appendix 13-12A in our copy of the original PAP, and <br />cannot find a letter from the State Land Board that addresses retention of fences as permanent <br />structures. If SCC does have the subject letter, please provide a copy for inclusion in <br />Appendix 13-12A, and provide amended narrative for Volume 14 page 2.05.3-2, <br />referencing the Appendix. Alternatively, if SCC does not have the subject letter from the <br />State Land Board, please revise the referenced statement on page 2.05.3-2, to state that <br />an executed State Land Board request for retention of permanent fencing depicted on <br />Map 2.05-M1 will be provided, prior to submittal of application for Phase III bond <br />release. With specific regard to the CSU shrub plot fencing, we note that if the State Land <br />Board does not desire to maintain the plot fencing following final bond release, the Division <br />would be amenable to revision of the subject paragraph on page 2.05.3-2, to allow for removal <br />of the fencing in conjunction with final bond release. <br />17A. This is a new adequacy item. Page 2.05.5-1 includes a reference to comments on the <br />postmining land use from legal owners and state and local government agencies which would <br />have to initiate, implement, approve, or authorize the proposed use of the land following <br />reclamation. The subject paragraph includes a reference to "various Findings Documents for <br />the Seneca II Mine in the original permit document", the wording of which is not entirely clear <br />(findings documents are not included within the permit document). Please remove the <br />reference in parentheses in the final sentence on page 2.05.5-1, and replace it with the <br />following sentence. The owner of the land in the Seneca II reduced permit area is the <br />Colorado State Land Board. Please see various letters from the State Land Board in <br />Appendix 13-12A acknowledging the livestock grazing/wildlife habitat postmining use, and <br />requesting various permanent structures to support such postmining use. <br />2.04.7 and 2.05.6(3) <br />18. In this item, the Division requested amended language following the 2nd paragraph under <br />Probable Hydrologic Consequences on page 2.04.7-1, to clearly explain the location and <br />importance of Sites SSF11 and SSF13. Appropriate amended language was provided. Item <br />Resolved. <br />19. In this item, the Division requested that the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph under <br />"Monitoring Plan" be revised to include specific references to corresponding monitoring plan <br />5