My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-10-25_HYDROLOGY - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-10-25_HYDROLOGY - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:09 PM
Creation date
10/27/2010 7:54:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
10/25/2010
Doc Name
Third Quarter Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Results
From
Cotter
To
CDPHE/WQCD
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Client: Copper Mountain CMD CO-0021598 SCG Project No.: 310921 <br />Site: WWTP <br />Table 1. Statistics methods used in testing for significant differences in test parameters. <br />Species Normality Homogeneity <br />Ceriodaphnia dubia Kolmogorov Test Bartlett's Test <br />Fathead minnow Shapiro - Wilk's Test Bartlett's Test <br /> Statistical Difference <br /> Survival Growth Reproduction IC25 <br />Ceriodaphnia dubia N/A N/A Dunnett's Test ICp <br />Fathead minnow Dunnett's Test Dunnett's Test N/A ICp <br />RESULTS <br />Ceriodaphnia dubia Test Results <br />Test results for the Ceriodaphnia dubia are summarized in Table 2 and provided on the <br />data sheets located in Appendix 2. Survival was 100% in the 100% effluent concentration and <br />100% in the remaining effluent concentrations. Control survival was 100%. No statistically <br />significant mortality was measured in any effluent concentration. The IC25 for survival was <br />> 100%. <br />Table 2. Summary of Ceriodaphnia dubia test results. Ten animals were exposed at each <br />concentration. An asterisk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference from the control. <br /> <br />No <br />M Significant Difference <br /> <br />Concentration . <br />Surviving ean <br />Births <br />Min. <br />Max. <br />Survival <br />Re rod. <br />Control (0%) 10 17.9 10 29 <br />12.5% 10 15.8 8 21 <br />25% 10 14.7 10 21 <br />50% 10 13.1 6 21 <br />75% 10 15.1 4 22 <br />100% 10 15.2 11 23 <br />Average numbers of neonates was 15.2 in the 100% effluent concentration and ranged <br />from 14.7 - 15.8 in the remaining effluent concentrations. Average number of neonates in the <br />control was 17.9 for statistical analyses and 17.9 for test acceptability criteria. No statistically <br />significant differences in the number of neonates were found between the control and any <br />effluent concentration. The IC25 for reproduction was > 100%. <br />SeaCrest Group 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.