My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-10-22_PERMIT FILE - M2010071 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010071
>
2010-10-22_PERMIT FILE - M2010071 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:07 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 3:24:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010071
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/22/2010
Doc Name
New Appl- Ground Water Response Study
From
The City of Lafayette
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />from Google Earth was coordinated with the model coordinates and the model plan <br />view boundaries were set to 6,000 feet by 6,000 feet. <br />The topographic mapping of the reservoir, topographic mapping by the U.S. <br />Geologic Survey and known ground surface elevations at several locations away from <br />the reservoir complex were used to develop ground surface elevations for the model. <br />After developing the surface topography, ground surface elevations were summarized <br />in a spreadsheet and imported into the model. The bedrock surface elevations were <br />generated from the data in the geotechnical report in Appendix B to generate the <br />bedrock surface imported into the model. <br />Two layers were used for the model. Layer No. 1 was the soils over the <br />bedrock and Layer No. 2 the bedrock. The soils over the bedrock in the vicinity of the <br />reservoir complex were man-placed fills, the wind blown clays, silts and fine sands <br />and the alluvium. The bedrock was claystone. The ground water was in the alluvium <br />over the bedrock. CTL T elected to use a two layer model because it was judged <br />. better to assign average engineering properties to the alluvium because its natural <br />variability was infinite and the permeability of the claystone was many magnitudes <br />less than the alluvium. <br />The field and laboratory studies done for the geotechnical report in Appendix <br />B included measuring engineering properties of the alluvium and the bedrock. After <br />reviewing these studies CTL T assigned a hydraulic conductivity to each of the two <br />layers. Layer No. 1 was assigned a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-4 cm/s (0.28 ft/day) <br />and Layer No. 2 was assigned a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-6 cm/s (0.0028 ft/day). <br />Generally, these hydraulic conductivities were consistent with field and laboratory <br />measured values as well as values for similar subsurface conditions and soil/bedrock <br />types. <br />Boundary Conditions <br />Every groundwater flow model requires an appropriate set of boundary <br />conditions to represent the exchange of flow between the model and the external <br />• system. The "Boundaries" menu item in Visual MODFLOW is divided into two <br />McLAUGHLIN WATER ENGINEERS, LTD. 8 <br />GOOSE HAVEN RESERVOIR COMPLEX EXPANSION <br />CTL I T PROJECT NO. FC04797.002-145
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.