My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-10-22_REVISION - M2008017 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2008017
>
2010-10-22_REVISION - M2008017 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:48:36 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 9:07:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008017
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/22/2010
Doc Name
TR-01 Adequacy Review Comment Responses
From
J&T Consulting, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR1
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1 - Soil Properties <br />Description Max dry density <br />c Saturated Density <br />c Cohesion <br />s Internal Friction <br />Angle <br />Slur Wall 62.4 62.4 0 60 <br />Sand and Gravel 110 125 0 35 <br />Weathered <br />Bedrock 125 141 100 18 <br />Stable Bedrock 125 141 2000 20 <br />DESIGN ANALYSIS AND CRITERIA <br />The proposed mining slopes were analyzed using the XSTABL v5.105a computer <br />program. XSTABL was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments <br />subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. <br />For Technical Revision No. 1, four cases were identified as critical during the mining <br />operation. Static and pseudo-static conditions were analyzed for each case, for both wet <br />mining and dewatered vertical slope configurations. <br />Pseudo-static peak acceleration factors were taken from USGS information for the <br />western United States. The 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years (the most <br />conservative) was used. <br />Surface loading equivalent to an HS 20 highway load was applied adjacent to each area <br />to simulate heavy equipment loading that could be present at that location for <br />maintenance or construction activities. <br />The revised interim mining side slopes will be vertical during wet mining and 3H:1 V after <br />the slurry wall is installed and the pit is dewatered. Only the interim mining vertical <br />slopes are analyzed in this report as the final mining 3H:1 V slope configurations were <br />analyzed and approved in the slope stability report submitted with the original permit <br />application. <br />Case 1a - South Property Line (SOUTH 1a). The mining operation is adjacent <br />to a private property on the south side of the site. The mining depth was <br />assumed to be 85 feet in this area based on bore log information in the <br />geotechnical reports. The proposed interim setback for mining is 120 feet from <br />the final mining limit (170 feet from the property line). <br />Case 2a - Existing Balsam Avenue ROW (WEST 2a). The mining operation is <br />adjacent to Balsam Avenue on the west side of the site. The mining depth was <br />assumed to be 75 feet in this area based on bore log information in the <br />geotechnical reports. The proposed interim setback for mining is 90 feet from the <br />final mining limit (130 feet from the existing ROW). <br />Broken Arrow Investments, LLC - Derr Pit - M-2008-17 <br />J&T Consulting, Inc. Technical Revision No. 1- Slope Stability Analysis <br />ia, Page 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.