Laserfiche WebLink
the Division. <br />(6) The first doc <br />Rainey was dor <br />statements. Bu <br />presented to the <br />that day on was <br />(7) Land Use <br />were prior to <br />(8) Montrose Co <br />irrigation to mab <br />Agriculture uses <br />supports a wide <br />the areas econon <br />county. So, why <br />historically irriga <br />DRYLAND becz <br />ALWAYS done <br />Program and mac <br />we don't have en <br />the property? <br />rnentation that was made by Western Fuels and checked of <br />properly for the most part, after Western Fuels were told t <br />then when Ross Gubka took over, documentation that was <br />)ivision and was not checked out and numerous Rules and <br />roken and appmved by the Division. Damages that are irre <br />issued say that these properties will be returned to <br />ity Commissioners Land Use states that this area depends i <br />tin consistent crop production. The CCC ditch is one of tb <br />proximately 92% of the private lands. This AGRICULT[ <br />riety of CROPS and LIVESTOCK and not only is a STRO <br />but is a part of the cherished beauty that is cherished by th <br />the State allowing Western Fuels as well as the Division t <br />d and cropped lands into DRYLAND and change half the : <br />se they won't listen to the farmer and respect his judgemen <br />th his farm. We farmed a long time before you were even <br />production a valued part of all of our lives. What gives yc <br />igh water to irrigate all of these farms as they were prior to <br />and verified by Mr. <br />correct those <br />iot correct was <br />egulations from <br />arable began. <br />Use, as they <br />n extensive <br />ise systems. <br />RAL LAND USE <br />JG component of <br />> residents of this <br />> change <br />arms into <br />and what he has <br />3 Regulatory <br />u the right to <br />the mine entering <br />(9) All material original documentation, permits, land use, everything h removed from <br /> <br />the court house <br />all maps, information, documentation, all of peabodys <br />e ha <br />ve BEEN . <br />RE <br />VISED TOO j <br />Y REFLECT ROSS GUBKA'S AND GREG LEWIC <br />1NTERPRETA NS and EVERYTHIlVG HAS BEEN REVISED( THE NALS ARE <br />GONE. WE T A COPY OF THOSE ORIGINALS MADE AVAIL O US. <br />(10) ALL docum tation of SOIL SUITABILITY has been revised is wrong. L WHICH ARE <br />A PART OF PR 6 and they have not been approved and are not acceptable b us at all. They <br />higher the salt tent, the rock fragments, the PH and we are not accpeting <br />Wf they say is <br />ult <br />suitable at all. <br />(11) As per info ation at the court house: Bud Bensons EAST and WEST p perties were to be <br />returned to 1RRI ATED FARMLAND AS TO BE FULLY FUNCTIONAL F R THE <br />PRODUCTION F irrigated PASTURE AND HAY TO THE EXTENT T IT WAS. Now, <br />you are stating as Western Fuels that there is not enough water and you wa put it in <br />DRYLAND. Yo Rules and Regulations specifically state that the landow <br />Z will be protected <br />and the propetyi will be returned to AS GOOD AS OR BETTER THAN WERE. <br />Y <br />Q2)Lettersare stn d in PR-06 to be in favor of PR-06 and that these letters are included in PR-06 <br />and there are NONE. All comments regarding PR-% had to be submitted after the last public <br />hearing which 20 days and there was a deadline and they would have to al tend the public <br />g abed LSj2-S96-0LS ueugtj R4iunwwo0 e4i.ingew Wd9i:b OT02 TZ 400