My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-05-17_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-05-17_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:40 PM
Creation date
10/15/2010 10:37:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/17/2002
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review for 112 Constr Materials App (faxed)
From
GCC Rio Grande
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY-17-2002 09:32 RGPC TIJERAS PLANT 505 281 9126 P.03 <br />Bruce Humphries <br />e" Jim Stevens <br />Al Amundson <br />Anthony Waldron <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />May 17, 2002 <br />Page 2 <br />had otherwise completed its adequacy determination. As I have indicated to Mr. Waldron, it is <br />important to us that we make sure we allow a reasonable period of time to allow a technical <br />dialogue and any needed technical refinements to the application to occur. As such, we <br />understand that the Mined Land Reclamation Board Rules and Regulations, Rule 1.4.5(3), allows <br />an applicant up to an additional 365 days to provide additional information to the Division. For <br />these reasons, we would like to request an additional 45 days to respond to the adequacy <br />determination, and also request that the Division establish July 8, 2002 as the date by which we <br />would plan to work through any issues and by which we would provide any additional written <br />materials to the Division. While we understand that this request will cause the current schedule <br />to be revised, we think the public's understanding of our process will be better served. <br />Based upon the positive experience we had in the course of obtaining the facility's air <br />quality permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, a sit-down <br />technical work session(s) provides an efficient and productive opportunity to continue the <br />dialogue on technical issues associated with the application. As such, we would like to meet <br />with the Division on June 5, 2002. Further, given the relationship we have with the State Land <br />Board and our commitment to continue to work closely with them, we suggest that they also be <br />involved in the upcoming technical dialogue. <br />Please let me know if our understanding regarding the Division's availability for a June 5 <br />technical work session is correct and whether we can provide the Division with any additional <br />information in the meantime. We look forward to continuing the positive technical dialogue <br />with the Division in the process of developing a draft permit. <br />Sincerely, <br />L?? /). <br />d? 2.41 <br />Brian McGill <br />Environmental Manager <br />GCC Rio Grande, Inc. <br />cc: Mark Davis <br />Minerals Director <br />Colorado State Land Board <br />y
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.