My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-05-01_PERMIT FILE - M2002004 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-05-01_PERMIT FILE - M2002004 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:37 PM
Creation date
10/15/2010 10:36:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/1/2002
Doc Name
Comments (email)
From
Robert Mahaney and Green Party of Colorado
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 Page 1 of 2 <br />Waldron, Tony <br />From: robert mahaney [rmahaney4@attbi.com] <br />Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:02 AM <br />To: Lwayno@aol.com; Barber, Margaret <br />May 1 St, 2002 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80202 <br />Dear Division, <br />As we represent residents of Pueblo County, the area where the Rio Grande <br />Portland Cement Plant is proposed, we are concerned about the quality of its <br />Reclamation Plan. The permit application is complex and requires much study. <br />Please extend the public comment period for an additional 70 days and <br />schedule a public hearing on the permit. It is imperative that this meeting <br />be held in Pueblo, in the evening, so that the public may attend. <br />The areas that need to be addressed at the public hearing are the inadequacy <br />of the plan to restore the area to use as rangeland based on the amounts of <br />water and seed specified, in relation to the climatic conditions of the <br />area; <br />- the monitoring requirements for reclaimed areas are unspecific and <br />insufficient, and do not adequately protect the public from continued <br />blowing dust - which occur indefinitely, according to the plan; <br />- the monitoring requirements for reclaimed areas are unspecific and <br />insufficient, and do not adequately protect the public from continued <br />blowing dust - which occur indefinitely, according to the plan; <br />- time limits described are not specific, and terms such as <br />"completion" are inadequately defined; <br />- the plan is vague throughout - it basically fails to outline in <br />detail a specific plan; <br />- information on mineral rights is missing; <br />- there is no evidence of how the hydrologic balance of the affected <br />land and the surrounding area will be preserved; <br />5/6/02
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.