My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-05-06_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-05-06_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:38 PM
Creation date
10/15/2010 10:36:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/6/2002
Doc Name
Objections Concerning the Reclamation Permit Application Submitted by GCC Rio Grande, Inc.
From
Law Offices of Debra Eiland
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Surface and Ground Water Protection <br />CCAP's members are deeply concerned about protecting the quality and quantity of both <br />ground and surface water because thousands of families depend on the water from the Dakota <br />and Cheyenne aquifers for daily survival. In drought years like this one, when the Dakota aquifer <br />will not be recharged at the usual rate because there is little snowmelt expected from the <br />Greenhorn and Wet Mountains, this issue is especially critical. <br />Water - General Requirements: <br />Contamination by Blasting Agent! <br />Rio Grande's permit application does not meet the requirements of Rule 3.1.6 (1), which <br />states that "disturbances to the ... quality of water in surface and groundwater systems both <br />during and after the mining operation and during reclamation shall be minimized by measures <br />including, but not limited to, ... [(b)] compliance with. statewide water quality standards and <br />site-specific classifications and standards adopted by the Water Quality Control Commission" <br />and provision (3), which requires all surfaces of the affected land to be "stabilized and protected <br />so as to effectively control erosion." The mining plan provides no analysis of the effects on <br />water of its intended blasting agent. <br />CCAP.'s research suggests that the St. Charles River, Greenhorn Creek, and the two <br />aquifers underlying the area, the Dakota and Cheyenne Aquifers, will become contaminated from <br />the fifteen tons of ammonium nitrate mixed with diesel fuel oil Rio Grande intends to use each <br />week as a blasting agent in the mining operation. These water sources are used by surrounding <br />residents for wells, farming, and watering cattle The St. Charles River flows into the Arkansas <br />River, a prime source of irrigation water. <br />The EPA has recognized.the dangers to water supplies from the use of ammonium nitrate <br />both as a fertilizer and as a blasting agent used for mining. The nitrates and nitrites left after <br />combustion do not bind to soils. They do not evaporate, and they have a high potential to <br />migrate to groundwater. Nitrates and nitrites remain in water until they are consumed by <br />humans, animals, plants, or other organisms. The maximum containment level for safe drinking <br />water is 10 PPM for nitrates and only one PPM for nitrites. The mining plan calls for <br />pneumatically loading 360 lbs. of ammonium nitrate and diesel fuel oil into a 30' by 36' deep <br />bore hold for each 15' by 12' by 30' block. The area described in the application for weekly <br />mining means 80 such holes will. be used each week. Lacking sufficient oxygen for this <br />operation under such conditions, and the tremendous amount of materials being used, suggests <br />that contamination will soon follow. Water from daily spraying of the area for dust control and <br />runoff will eventually seep into the aquifers through porous limestone and sandstone, carrying <br />contaminants with it. <br />Future illnesses resulting from nitrate and nitrite contamination, should they occur, could <br />cost the state a significant amount of money-much more in lawsuits than will ever be collected <br />in royalties from this company over the next 50 years. Topsoil that has been on the surface
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.