Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Limestone Quarry Access Road and Overview Cultural Resources Inventory <br />1.0 Introduction <br />URS Corporation (URS) was retained to conduct an intensive pedestrian survey of a proposed <br />access road and an overview survey and predictive model for a proposed limestone quarry <br />area. Work consisted of a file search, archival research, an intensive survey of approximately <br />42 acres for the proposed access road, and a reconnaissance survey of the proposed quarry <br />area. Henceforth, the proposed quarry area will be referred to as the proposed project area <br />while the proposed 1.75-mile access road will be referred to as the intensive survey area <br />(Figure 1). There is also an area to the west of the project area that is part of a larger proposed <br />lease area. The project area lies in portions of Sections 6, 7 and 18, T22S, R64W, and Sections <br />1, 12 and 13, T22S, R65W, and covers approximately 1,200 acres of rangeland. The intensive <br />survey was confined to Sections 1, 12, and 13, T22S, R65W, and covers 42 acres. <br />The land on which the proposed actions will occur is owned by the State of Colorado and is <br />leased from the state. As such, these actions are subject to the provisions of the Colorado <br />Historical, Prehistorical and Archaeological Resources Act of 1973 (CRS 24-80-401 to 410) and <br />implementing regulations. In essence, this act grants title to historical, prehistorical, and <br />archaeological resources on state lands to the State of Colorado. It has been interpreted by the <br />Attorney General's Office to require consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer <br />(SHPO) only in instances when properties located on state lands and listed on the National or <br />State registers will be affected (K. Hardy, personal communication 2001). However, the SHPO <br />can be asked to comment on project effects at anytime regardless of land ownership status and <br />it is advisable to do so in cases that involve priorities that have been determined eligible by the <br />SHPO or are considered potentially eligible by consultants. <br />The work was performed under State of Colorado Archaeological Permit number 2001-41. <br />Robert J. Mutaw, Ph.D. served as principal investigator and author of this report. JoAnne Braun <br />assisted Dr. Mutaw with the archival.research and site form preparation and contributed to the <br />report. Dr. Mutaw conducted fieldwork for the project on June 25, 2001. <br />2.0 Environmental Context <br />' This section provides the general environmental context for the proposed project area. This is <br />useful for understanding the prehistoric and historic resource potential of the area and the <br />conditions that influence archaeological site development and preservation. It contains <br />' descriptions of the project area environment. in terms of its physiography, geology, soils, climate, <br />vegetation, and wildlife. <br />' Physiography <br />The proposed project area is located in the Colorado Piedmont section of the Great Plains <br />' Physiographic Province (Fenneman 1931; Painter et al. 1999). Most of the project area lies in <br />an intermediate zone between the Front Range Uplift to the west and the Great Plains to the <br />east. The area is characterized by both flat, rolling plains and moderate to deeply cut drainages <br />and canyons marking the major' watercourses in the region. The St. Charles River, one of the <br />main tributaries in the Arkansas River drainage basin, crosses the project area. Elevation in the <br />project area ranges from 4,840 ft above mean sea level (amsl) at the north end of the project <br />area to nearly 5,000 ft amsl at the south end. <br /> <br />? U?.S ,