Laserfiche WebLink
Changes in stream alluvial systems due to the proposed expanded underground mining in the EMD would vary <br />spatially. Supplemental mine - related flows to Foidel Creek during mine operations will alter the intermittent <br />• nature of the stream and contribute to the adjacent alluvial system. Hence, some flows will occur in Foidel <br />Creek at times not normally observed under historical ambient conditions. In the case of mine discharges to <br />Fish Creek, a perennial stream, mine -flow impacts would be minor compared to Foidel Creek due to the base <br />flows occurring under historical ambient conditions. Analogous conclusions could be made regarding water - <br />quality impacts of mine flows. Due to the smaller and intermittent flows in Foidel Creek, the relative water - <br />quality impacts of mining would be more pronounced than for Fish Creek. <br />Regarding the cumulative hydrologic impacts of concurrent ongoing discharge from historic surface mined <br />areas, and current and proposed underground mining in the permit area, the modeling analysis described above <br />and presented in Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface Water Resources of the Trout <br />Creek Basin, characterized historical ambient conditions and the anticipated changes due to the proposed <br />expanded underground mining, in terms of streamflow and water - quality changes in streams of the Trout Creek <br />Basin and in an associated stream reach of the Yampa River. An updated assessment of regional cumulative <br />impacts, (see, for example, Kaman Tempo, 1982, Rerraro and Nazaryk, 1983) would have to take into account <br />current mining activities and plans of other mining entities in the Yampa River Basin. Although WATBAL <br />predictions in Exhibit 32 are reasonable, more recent data have been used to evaluate the expected <br />concentrations. A comparison was made between the WATBAL predictions in Exhibit 32 and data generated <br />for the 1993 Annual Hydrology Report. Data for lower Fish Creek are from Station 1003, which is coincident <br />with Node 19 of Exhibit 32 for which WATBAL calculations were made. The weighted means of 1993 <br />measured concentrations of TDS and sulfate (329 mg/1 and 155 mg/l, respectively) are less than the WATBAL <br />calculated concentrations for the 1992 -2000 water years of 491 mg/1 and 196 mg/l, respectively. These results <br />indicated that no additional hydrologic impacts occured other than those predicted based on the results of <br />Exhibit 32. Details for predicted concentrations and SAR values are in Exhibit 7h, Tables 1 -5 which are based <br />on data from AHR, 1993. There was no discharge from the underground mine in water year 1997, the mean <br />• discharge and weighted mean TDS and sulfate at Station 1003 (the equivalent of Node 19) were 6.02 cfs, 666 <br />mg/L and 292 mg/L respectively. The flow value is equivalent to the modeled low flow of 6.9 cfs but the TDS <br />and sulfate levels are higher than the modeled 456 mg/L and 181 mg/L for baseline conditions. <br />The WATBAL model did not predict SAR values, but actual SAR values at Station 1003 on Fish Creek ranged <br />from 0.36 to 4.89 in the 1993 AHR. The maximum SAR value measured in water year 1997 was 1.24. Water <br />with SAR values less than ten is classified as low- sodium water and can be used for irrigation with little danger <br />of developing harmful levels of exchangeable sodium. <br />Data for lower Trout Creek is from Station 69 of the 1993 AHR. Station 69 is upstream from Node 22, the <br />location for which WATBAL calculations were made. The weighted means of the 1993 measured values for <br />TDS and sulfate (406 mg/l and 219 mg/1) exceed those predicted by the WATBAL model of 338 mg/l and 139 <br />mg/l, respectively. Because Station 69 is upstream from Node 22 and above the confluence with Fish Creek, <br />however, these concentrations are not strictly comparable to the calculated concentrations of the WATBAL. <br />model. If the effects of dilution were accounted for, the concentrations observed at Station 69 would probably <br />be significantly reduced by the time the Yampa River is reached. For this reason, it is unlikely that the TDS and <br />sulfate concentrations at Station 69 would differ markedly from those predicted by the WATBAL model. There <br />was no discharge from the underground mine in water year 1997, the mean discharge and weighted mean TDS <br />and sulfate at Station 69 where 70.8 cfs, 384 mg/L and 183 mg/L respectively. The flow value is much larger <br />than the modeled baseline mean flow rate of 46.4 cfs, the TDS is equivalent to the mean modeled baseline <br />concentration of 383 mg/L and the sulfate concentration is a little larger than the mean modeled baseline <br />concentration of 158 mg/L. <br />The concentrations of TDS and sulfate immediately below the confluence of Fish Creek and Trout Creek were <br />Is estimated by calculating a weighted mean using data from Stations 1003 and 69. This calculation yields 367 <br />mg/l for TDS and 186 mg/1 for sulfate, which compares to WATBAL predictions of 338 mg/l and 139 mg/1 for <br />TDS and sulfate, respectively, for lower Trout Creek. SAR values along Trout Creek at Station 69 were all <br />below 1.0, which is within the category of low- sodium water. There was no discharge from the underground <br />mine in water year 1997, the mean discharge and weighted mean TDS and sulfate at Station 1005 (site below <br />PR09 -08 2.05 -165 04/29/09 <br />