My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2010-06-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:47 PM
Creation date
10/14/2010 10:11:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/4/2010
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-123 to 2.05-197.3
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
flow, sediment load, and sediment characteristics will all influence the advent or extent of damage that may <br />require repair. <br />Predicted Impacts - Fish Creek It is anticipated that Fish Creek will respond similarly to the response observed <br />in Foidel Creek, which overlies the 7 -, 8 -, and 9 -Right Panels. The response observed is for a pool to form in <br />the subsidence trough for the respective panel. The extent of the pool will be dictated by the bank height. <br />Typically, the subsidence trough lessens in magnitude as you move from the centerline of the panel until it <br />reaches zero at the angle of draw limit. As was evidenced in the EMD, i.e., no head - cutting at gateroads, the <br />formation of the pool decreases erosional potential within the subsided segment of the stream. <br />The pre and postmining gradients of Fish Creek are presented on Table 4 of Exhibit 7e -3. With the formation of <br />the pools over Panels 13 -Right through 16- Right, TCC is not projecting any erosional problems in the stream <br />channel, using the historic flow data for Fish Creek, and the visual observations along Foidel Creek which <br />overlaid Panels 7- through 9- Right. These observations did not detect any erosional problems caused by TCC's <br />mining operations. <br />The pre and postmining gradients of Fish Creek are presented on Table 4 of Exhibit 7e -6, Twentymile Coal <br />Company, AVF Subsidence Study, Final Report. With the formation of the pools over Panels 17 -Right and 18- <br />Right, TCC is not projecting any erosional problems in the stream channel, using the historic flow data for Fish <br />Creek, and the visual observations along Fish Creek which overlaid Panels 13- through 14- Right. These <br />observations did not detect any erosional problems caused by TCC's mining operations. <br />A potential outcome from creation of the small pools is an increase in water temperature during the summer <br />months. A look at the historic data for the months of June through September indicates that the segment of Fish <br />Creek to be subsided during this five -year term already exhibits elevated temperatures during this period. The <br />historic data is presented in Table 71, Period of Record Average Temperatures, dated June through September. <br />• Stations 16 and 302 are upstream of the subsided area and will not be impacted by the proposed mining in the <br />Northern Mining District. As reflected in the data, these stations record the coolest temperatures during the <br />period of intent, although both stations reflect temperatures of greater then 18° Celsius during July. Station <br />1002 is located over Panel 13 -Right and will be the only station impacted by the mining activities. As noted on <br />Table 71, average water temperature range from 16.3 to 19.1° C during June through August, and 14.2° C <br />during September. The temperatures during June through August are not conducive form maintaining a Cold- <br />water fishery. Likewise, the water temperatures for Stations 27A and 1003 reflect higher temperatures than <br />Station 1002. This would be considered normal given their location on lower Fish Creek <br />Again, the temperatures are not conducive for maintaining a cold -water fishery. Given historic flow declines in <br />the creek during the summer months, no significant impacts are anticipated to result from the undermining and <br />subsiding of the various segments of Fish Creek. Likewise, the TDS concentrations are low enough at this point <br />to believe that there will be no impacts to TDS concentrations in these pools. TCC is planning to recirculate <br />underground water so that discharge to Fish Creek is not increased over the historic level during the NMD <br />permit year. Therefore, there should be no quality impact to the streams due to the continued mining in the <br />Northern Mining Districts. The exception to this is the short-term impact associated with dewatering the <br />reservoir in the WMD. This is discussed in TR 99 -32. <br />Mining of the WMD will result in undermining and subsidence of areas underlying the Fish Creek channel over <br />Panels 12 -, 13 -, and 14 -Left. Given that TCC has previously undermined and subsided Panels 12- through 19- <br />Right in the NMD with no adverse effect on the Fish Creek channel, it is reasonable to anticipate that the <br />proposed mining in the WMD will have similar effects on the overlying segment of the Fish Creek channel. <br />Actual Impacts — Fish Creek TCC has subsided segments of Fish Creek over longwall Panels 12- through 19- <br />Right. As documented by the Semi - Annual Subsidence Reports for the period 2001 through 2008, subsidence <br />did not result in any measurable loss of flow or significant ponding in Fish Creek. Minor ponding was <br />observed, particularly where the existing Fish Creek culverts pass under the Union Pacific Railroad Spur, <br />however, this minor ponding did not result in any significant observed erosion or water quality impacts. <br />PR09 -08 2.05 -163 04/29/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.