My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2010-06-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:47 PM
Creation date
10/14/2010 10:11:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/4/2010
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-123 to 2.05-197.3
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
previous section, flow rates in Trout Creek will be estimated based upon a regression relationship with the <br />stream gaging station on the Yampa River below Steamboat Springs. <br />• Summaries of possible results from the mass balance calculation are shown in Exhibit 51, Table E51 -23 and <br />E51 -24. Modeling indicates that Site 115 should be able to discharge at the maximum loading under all <br />modeled cases and at the modeled mean flow rate. Discharges from Sites 109, above 900, and 115 may be <br />adjusted, as needed, during periods of low flow to meet applicable stream standards. <br />Yampa River (Below Diversion near Hayden) <br />As would be expected at this downstream location on the Yampa River, streamflow increases only nominally <br />(less than 0.1 percent), and concentrations for all mine periods were not affecting Yampa River constituent <br />levels, except for specific conductance and sulfate concentration during the initial mine period (that is, 1984 <br />through 1991 water years). These increases were approximately 1 µmhos /cm for specific conductance and 1 <br />mg/L for sulfate concentration. Model prediction results for streamflow, dissolved solids concentration and <br />sulfate concentration for each of the four mining periods are summarized in Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality <br />Modeling Analyses of Surface -Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin. <br />A comparison of predicted increases in concentrations due to the 32 -year time span of mine- related impacts <br />downstream on the Yampa River (USGS Station 09244410) was provided for dissolved solids and for sulfate <br />(Exhibit 32, Quantity and Quality Modeling Analyses of Surface -Water Resources of the Trout Creek Basin). <br />The original modeling indicated that the differences would be barely discernible. The year -by -year, as well as <br />the time trend of decreasing incremental differences in average baseline versus mine impacted concentrations, is <br />apparent from these tabular comparisons. New modeling indicates that with the increased salt loading of the <br />discharges some impacts can be observed in the modeling. <br />In the modeling developed for TR -32 (June, 1999) the maximum load to the Yampa River from the underground <br />mine discharges is 22 tons per day (8,300 tons /year). The anticipated dissolved solids loads contributed to the <br />• <br />stream system from mine flows will impact average ambient conditions in lower Trout Creek (about 70 <br />tons /day) and to a lesser degree, the Yampa River (approximately 250 tons /day). On an annual basis, these <br />averaged ambient dissolved solids loads would reflect over 25,400 tons /year for lower Trout Creek and about <br />89,600 tons /year for the Yampa River near Hayden. The impact will be to increase the dissolved solids loading <br />in lower Trout Creek 31 percent and in the Yampa River by 9 percent. Similar increases in the sulfate levels <br />will also occur. <br />Stream Standards Comparisons <br />The State of Colorado stream standards applicable for the study area consist of: <br />• Segment 2c: Yampa River, mainstem from confluence with Oak Creek to confluence with Elkhead <br />Creek <br />• Segment 13a: Trout Creek and tributaries not within a National Forest, excluding Segments 13b, <br />13c, and 13f, from its source to confluence with Fish Creek <br />• Segment 13b: Foidel Creek and all tributaries and Fish Creek and Middle Creek and all tributaries, <br />from County Road 27 to confluence with Trout Creek <br />• Segment 13c: Trout Creek from headgate of Spruce Hill Ditch to confluence with Fish Creek and <br />tributaries to Trout Creek from County Road 27 to County Road 179 <br />• Segment 13f: Trout Creek and tributaries from confluence with Fish Creek to confluence with <br />Yampa River <br />• The segments have similar water quality standards, except that Segments 2c, 13a, and 13f include drinking <br />water standards if they are being utilized for active water supply, Segment 13b does not include drinking water <br />standards, and Segment 13c includes drinking water standards from June through February. The effect of these <br />segment - specific standards is that the sulfate, chromium I11, and iron drinking water standards (active drinking <br />RN08 -05 2.05 -156 03/12/10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.