My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2010-06-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:47 PM
Creation date
10/14/2010 10:11:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/4/2010
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-123 to 2.05-197.3
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SWMD, where it will report to the Fish Creek Borehole sump, and can be transferred to the Barricade Chamber, <br />the Area 1 Pit, or discharged to Fish Creek at Site 115. <br />is The two underground mine water storage reservoirs, in the SWMD (dewatered by Fish Creek dewatering <br />boreholes), in the EMD ( dewatered by the IORT dewatering boreholes), provide an estimated storage capacity <br />of approximately 1,410 and 2,540 acre -feet, respectively. In order to maintain adequate freeboard <br />(approximately 25 feet below the minimum seal elevation = 5,935 ft for SWMD, and 5,889 ft for EMD), the <br />storage pools are now being pumped intermittantly to maintain water levels below these maximum water level <br />elevations. Timing and water quality issues related to mine water discharge are discussed in "Effects on Ground <br />Water Quality of Aquifers and Surface Water Systems Impacts of Mine Water Discharge ". <br />Dewatering and Potentiometric Drawdown in Bedrock Units <br />Projected inflows to the mine from the Wadge overburden unit will cause dewatering and potentiometric <br />drawdown in the unit. Where the Twentymile Sandstone directly overlies the mine workings, it will also be <br />affected. To date, no measurable impact to the Trout Creek Sandstone has been observed, and water quality <br />data from mine inflows does not indicate any significant connection to either the overlying Twentymile <br />Sandstone or the underlying Trout Creek Sandstone. Well 006- 82 -48A, completed in the Twentymile <br />Sandstone, showed a rapid water level decline before being rendered inoperable due to being undermined by a <br />longwall panel. Other Twentymile Sandstone wells, however, which are not directly underlain by mine <br />workings, do not show any direct impact from mining. <br />Major fault zones are not expected to provide significant conduits for ground water flow through the marine <br />shale in the part of the basin underlain by the proposed mining activities. This is due to the nature of the marine <br />shales and the high overburden stress in this area, which would tend to keep the fault zones closed. Appreciable <br />ground water flows through fault zones has only been observed at the basin margins where overburden stress is <br />relieved. Well BRDH -7 is located approximately one -half mile from the mine workings and has not shown any <br />significant water level decline (Figure 12a). Future mining is expected to have only localized impact on water <br />levels in the Twentymile Sandstone. <br />The proximity of the Wadge overburden unit to the mined zone and the expectation of subsidence - induced <br />fracturing will result in dewatering of the unit immediately above and adjacent to active mine areas. Drawdown <br />of potentiometric levels in this unit will occur beyond the area of active mining as a result of lateral movement <br />of ground water toward these areas. <br />The extent of potentiometric lowering was investigated using the finite- difference simulation model described in <br />Exhibit 13, Ground Water Model Documentation. The model did not account for mine inflow derived from <br />dewatering of the overburden directly above active mining areas. However, this does not invalidate the <br />prediction of drawdown effects as this is based on the estimates of lateral movement toward mined areas which <br />was correctly assessed. The extent of potentiometric lowering is illustrated by predicted drawdown after 5 years <br />of mining (starting in 1983) and it is shown on Figure 13, Predictive Analysis After 5 Years of Mining. This <br />figure indicates that drawdown effects will extend to the outcrop areas of the overburden unit at the margin of <br />the Twentymile Park Basin. Evaluation of data from observation wells indicates that these predicted effects are <br />probably overestimated. <br />Recovery of potentiometric levels within the overburden unit will occur following mining through recharge of <br />the unit, primarily at the basin margins. Subsidence effects will cause fracturing and rubblization of the <br />overburden unit, so that its postmining permeability will initially be much higher than typical premining values. <br />Consequently, the rate of potentiometric recovery will primarily be governed by the rate of recharge. <br />• Recharge to the mine workings will primarily be from the updip spoils area of the adjacent Eckman Park surface <br />mine. During mining, and for most of the recovery period following mining, the workings and overlying <br />overburden adjacent to these spoils areas will not be saturated i.e. the effective potentiometric head will be at the <br />elevation of the base of the mined zone. The spoil at the old highwalls is expected to be fully saturated under <br />reclaimed conditions, as is the case near the Foidel Creek Mine portal area. The effective potentiometric head in <br />PR09 -08 2.05 -139 08/25/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.