My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2010-06-04_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:47 PM
Creation date
10/14/2010 10:11:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/4/2010
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-123 to 2.05-197.3
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ground Water Inflow to the Mine <br />The underground mining activities at the Foidel Creek Mine have the potential to drain ground water from the <br />mined coal seam, and overlying and immediately underlying rock units. Bedrock units overlying and <br />underlying the Wadge Coal Seam, which contain ground water, would typically have formation pressures higher <br />that the atmospheric pressure that would exist in any open mine workings. Consequently, if there is sufficient <br />hydrologic communication, there will be movement of ground water from these units into the active mine - <br />workings. <br />The overburden unit will be directly affected by the removal of the Wadge Coal Seam. Good hydrologic <br />communication with the unit may occur through natural fractures and faults, which are enhanced by stress - relief, <br />and subsidence related to the mining activity. Partial dewatering of the immediately overlying overburden unit <br />by gravity drainage is anticipated in active mine areas. Lateral movement of ground water in the overburden unit <br />toward the active mine areas will cause some dewatering and more general lowering of potentiometric levels <br />nearthe mine. <br />Historic Inflows - The Foidel Creek Mine has been operated since 1983. Since that time, inflows and discharges <br />have been monitored. In addition, future inflows have been estimated. Past inflow estimates have been made <br />using theoretical models. At the time the most recent inflow estimates were made (using historic inflow rates to <br />project future inflows), approximately 9,000 acres of area had been mined. <br />The quantity of mine inflow and the resultant effects on potentiometric levels on the Wadge overburden unit <br />were studied using a two - dimensional finite - difference, simulation model for the original Foidel Creek Mine <br />permit application (Exhibit 13, Ground Water Model Documentation). The results and predictions of the model <br />were used in the development of a Mine Water Control Plan included in Exhibit 33. Most of the estimated <br />inflow was projected to occur as leakage from the Trout Creek Sandstone through faults intersecting the mine. <br />This is based on the assumption that the faults would act as conduits and allow for flow of ground water into the <br />mine. The mine has intercepted several faults, however, because the faults are typically in compression they are <br />• relatively tight and inflows through the faults have been limited. <br />Through June 2006, none of the faults identified in this report had yielded sustained inflows. In addition, no <br />evidence has been found that there is any significant connection between the mine workings and either the <br />underlying Trout Creek Sandstone or the overlying Twentymile Sandstone. Only two significant localized <br />inflows were encountered; one in the 6 -Right Entry in late 1997, and one in the Northeast Mains fault crossing <br />in August 1999. <br />The discussion of the historic inflows are presented by mining area: 1) The North Mains and portal areas <br />(NMS); 2) The 1 -South Panel plus the Southwest panels (Panels 1 -SW to 3 -SW) plus the South Panels (1 -Left to <br />6 -Left) which will be called the Southwest Mining District (SWMD); 3) The East Mining District (EMD) <br />consisting of Panels 2Right to 9- Right; and 4) The North Mining District (NMD) consisting of Panels 12 -Right <br />through 16- Right. Future mining areas include the remaining panels in the North Mining District (NMD) and <br />the Western Mining District (WMD) containing the reserves to the north and west of the SWMD. Mining areas <br />and designations are shown on the Mine Plan Map, Map 23. <br />Inflows have historically been encountered in the NMS area. From 1993 to 2006, the inflows to the (NMS, <br />water from overlying surface -mined spoils), as measured in the annual mine inflow surveys, remained constant <br />at approximately 30 to 40 gpm. The conductivity of this water, which ranged from approximately 2,500 to <br />4,500 µmhos /cm, indicates that it is primarily derived from ground water that has been mixed with spoil water <br />from the up -dip spoils. A typical spoil well analysis is shown in Exhibit 49, Table E49 -1. It has a mixed cation - <br />sulfate/bicarbonate water with a conductivity of 3,610 µmhos /cm. In addition, most of this inflow has been <br />observed from seeps that are within 2,000 feet of the portal. <br />• No specific areas of high inflow occurred during development of the SWMD. Also, because the panels where <br />sealed sequentially after mining, these areas could not be accessed for the more recent mine inflow surveys, so <br />detailed information on mine inflows for this area could not be obtained. Estimates based on a composite of <br />several prior inflow studies and dewatering rates indicate that flows on the order of approximately55 gpm <br />PR09 -08 2.05 -135 04/22/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.