My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-01_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2010-06-01_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:34 PM
Creation date
10/14/2010 10:11:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/1/2010
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-65 to 2.05-122.1
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
previously disturbed, any stockpiled topsoil salvaged during the original disturbance activities will be replaced, and the <br />area will be reseeded with the pastureland seed mixture. <br />• Overland Belt Magnet (MR02 -179) <br />When the overland belt is no longer needed, it and its associated structures will be dismantled and removed from the <br />property. The concrete piers will be demolished to three feet Below grade and the concrete will be hauled to the pit for <br />burial. The metal from the framework will be recycled and the magnet offered to sister companies for use. The <br />concrete pad will be demolished and hauled to the pit for burial. The area then will be graded and reclaimed as per the <br />previously approved plan. <br />Soil Stabilization Plan <br />Proper site preparation and soil handling strategies will be utilized to control wind and water erosion. The <br />movement and manipulation of topsoil materials in a moist condition minimizes wind and water erosion. As <br />explained by Bauer et al. (1976), a protective surface seal develops as silt and clay fractions bond together after <br />reapplication of topsoil. This phenomenon is attributable to the rapid evaporation of surface moisture from <br />redistributed soil materials. <br />Disturbed areas will be subjected to final grading, but will remain in a rough condition to assist stability and resist <br />slippage of topsoil after reapplication. Leaving the graded surface in a roughened configuration also improves <br />moisture permeability between the spoil /topsoil interface (Bauer et at. 1976). Scrapers will reapply topsoil along <br />the contour whenever possible. The tracks made by scrapers create a "terracing" effect that helps to reduce <br />overland surface flow and the potential loss of topsoil. Following topsoil reapplication, but before seeding, the <br />topsoil will be graded to insure a uniform and stable thickness which will be consistent with the reclamation and <br />revegetation requirements. <br />• Prior to seeding, which will be initiated as soon as practical after final grading, topsoiled sites will be chisel - plowed <br />in order to alleviate compaction and promote water infiltration. Chisel - plowing has been a highly effective means <br />of temporary stabilization prior to vegetation establishment. Dollhopf et al. (1977) reported that chisel- plowed <br />topsoil at the Savage, Beulah and Colstrip Surface Mines were only surpassed by the radical treatment of dozer <br />basins in reducing overland water flow from reclaimed mine sites. The water detention capacity of chisel- plowed <br />topsoil is reported by Dollhopf et al. (1977) as 176,400 liters per hectare, or 2,521.3 cubic feet per acre. <br />Another stabilization technique which serves to minimize erosion is contour furrowing. Disturbed land within the <br />proposed permit area will be contour furrowed following seeding. A typical cross section of a contour furrow is <br />depicted in Figure 12, Design of Typical Contour Furrow. According to data derived from studies at the Energy <br />Mine No. 1, the water detention capacity of these furrows, when spaced thirty feet apart, is 2,599.7 cubic feet per <br />acre. <br />TR09 -70 2.05 — 106.2 AP ®VZD FEB 0 � 1Q11 11/16/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.