My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-01_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2010-06-01_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:34 PM
Creation date
10/14/2010 10:11:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/1/2010
Doc Name
Pages 2.05-65 to 2.05-122.1
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Previously, during evaluation of the CRDA, as permitted under TR -15, a chemical analysis of the processed waste <br /> material was completed, with the results presented as Table 20A, Waste Material Analysis. Based on this analysis, <br /> it appears the refuse materials are not potentially toxic - forming or acid - generating. The previously referenced <br /> CTL/Thompson report addressing the CRDA design and geotechnical evaluation includes a conservative estimate <br /> of the maximum quantity of water projected to drain from within the pile (see Exhibit 26A, page 17). The estimate <br /> is based upon the assumption that 3 inches of water infiltrates into and discharges from the pile on an annual basis. <br /> The analysis further assumes that discharge from the pile occurs during a one -month time period. Under these <br /> conditions, the average calculated flow from the drain is 0.2 cfs for the month drainage occurs. The discharge from <br /> the refuse pile rock drain will be routed to Pond D. Given the very limited volume of rock drain discharge relative <br /> to the surface water runoff contributions typically received by Pond D, no adverse water quality impacts are <br /> anticipated as a result of construction of the waste pile. Pond D will continue to be monitored for the applicable <br /> NPDES discharge permit parameters as required. <br /> The permanent diversion ditches on and around the perimeter of the CRDA (see Map 24 and Exhibit 26A, <br /> Appendix D) were established prior to constructing the refuse pile. The uppermost portion of the west side <br /> diversion ditch segment RDA -lb, however, was temporarily aligned slightly to the east of the location depicted on <br /> Map 24 in order to avoid the established topsoil stockpile (SF -6) in this area (see Exhibit 26A, Figure 2). Topsoil <br /> Stockpile SF -6 remained in its original location and will be utilized as the initial topsoil source for reclamation of <br /> the refuse pile benches. In the event Topsoil Stockpile SF -6 has not been reduced through topsoil replacement to <br /> the degree necessary to allow construction of the final configuration of ditch RDA -lb once the pile is developed to <br /> this elevation, any portion of Topsoil Stockpile SF -6 conflicting with the final ditch alignment will be relocated and <br /> the permanent diversion ditch will be established between the existing sections. TCC does not intend to riprap the <br /> temporarily located portion of Ditch RDA -lb, but will riprap the ditch when the final alignment is established. <br /> In order to facilitate the establishment of vegetation in permanent diversion Ditch RDA -2, temporary rock check - <br /> dams will be installed in selected segments of the ditch. The design of these rock check -dams can be found in <br /> Exhibit 26 -a(1), Refuse Pile, Rock Check -Dam design. It should be noted that these dams will not exceed one foot <br /> j in height, and extend across the 8 -foot wide ditch bottom. The 12 -foot rock dams will extend up the ditch <br /> sideslopes to the flow -line. The rock check -dams will be placed according to the following spacing interval: Slopes <br /> 1 percent or less - every 100 feet, 2 percent slope - every 50 feet, 3 percent slope - 3 dams per 100 -foot segment of <br /> ditch, 4 percent slope — 4 dams per 100 -foot segment of ditch, 5 percent slope - 5 dams per 100 -foot segment of <br /> ditch, and 8 percent slope - 8 dams per 100 -foot segment of ditch. <br /> Temporary diversion ditches designed to convey the 100 -year, 24 -hour storm runoff will be cut -in approximately <br /> 50 feet upslope from the working area of the CRDA as pile construction progresses. The temporary ditches will be <br /> established in areas stripped of topsoil, and are intended to divert surface runoff away from the exposed coal waste <br /> materials during construction of the pile. TCC estimates a maximum of six temporary ditches will be established <br /> throughout the life of the pile. <br /> Coal Refuse Disposal Area Modification (TR95 -21, TR05 -49, MR08 -233) <br /> The CRDA construction sequence and final grading are modified as reflected in Exhibit 26A -1. The modification <br /> of the construction sequence and final grading will result in a stable refuse pile configuration in accordance with the <br /> requirement of the DMG regulations. The bench ditch design is presented in Exhibit 8M. It should be noted the <br /> bench design is adequate to pass runoff from the 100 -year, 24 -hour event. <br /> All of the provisions provided in Exhibit 26 will continue to be followed by TCC, except as modified by Exhibit <br /> 26A -1. The modification presented in Exhibit 26A -1 can be summarized as follows: <br /> 1) Segmented Construction — The requirement to place and compact the fill in 24 -inch lifts will be followed, with <br /> testing of every other lift to verify compaction requirements are met. The southern portion of the CRDA will be the <br /> primary temporary stockpiling area, although the entire footprint of the pile can be used for temporary stockpiling <br /> of refuse material to allow for temporary storage of material during the winter, when adequate compaction may not <br /> be feasible, and to allow water to drain from the refuse prior to placement and compaction. <br /> TR09 -67 2.05 -97 06/16/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.