Laserfiche WebLink
• Continuous readings from an ash analyzer on the main underground production coal conveyor determine <br />• whether the production flow on the slope conveyor is routed to the Run -of -Mine (ROM) Coal Stockpile or <br />the Low — Quality Coal Stockpile by the flop -gate at the discharge of the slope conveyor. Since the new <br />Washplant is designed to process a significant portion of the ROM coal flow, the ash cut -off threshold for <br />designation as low- quality coal was increased. This change results in an increase in the percentage of coal <br />routed to the ROM Stockpile and a reduction in percentage to the Low - Quality Coal Stockpile. <br />• The coal - handling system for the low- quality coal was simplified to eliminate the flex -tooth crusher, one <br />intermediate conveyor, and the two associated transfer points <br />• The tailpiece for the existing Overland Conveyor was moved to the west and the belt shortened by <br />approximately 700 feet to accommodate the elevated belt from the ROM Stockpile reclaim system to the <br />top of the new Screening/Crushing Building. Belt speed was increased to accommodate a feed rate of <br />2,200 tph (12.OMM tpy) <br />• The thickener overflow sump for Washplant I was eliminated and replaced with piping to carry thickener <br />overflow to the larger overflow sump constructed for Washplant II <br />• The primary and secondary crushers, and stoker coal and coal sampling systems in the BOB area were <br />removed and the associated chute -work modified to allow direct pass - through of the product coal stream, <br />since screening, crushing, and sampling will now occur in the Washplant II area. The associated Primary <br />Crusher, Secondary Crusher, and Sampling buildings were retained, along with utilities and dust - control <br />equipment to address potential air emissions from coal - handling and transfer points. <br />The following sections describe the construction and operation of the various components of the new Washplant II <br />complex. Facility locations, configuration, and operating relationships are shown by the Freshwater Systems and <br />Surface facilities Map, Map 24 (Sheet 1/3), and the design drawings and process flow diagrams included in Exhibit <br />49K, Washplant II Design Drawings. <br />The entire Washplant II area was disturbed by soil pre -strip activities associated with the previous surface mining <br />activities, therefore, no soil material remained in this area. Drainage from and through this area is controlled by the <br />existing Sedimentation Ponds D and E. Due to changes in site topography resulting from construction grading <br />activities, the following drainage modifications were necessary: <br />• Ditch D -2 was relocated to the south, paralleling the Refuse Haulroad, two culverts were added under the <br />Washplant H yard -area access, and the eastern inlet to Sedimentation Pond D was shifted to the south and <br />west. Contributing watershed areas and conditions did not change significantly, ditch and culverts sizes <br />were maintained, and ditch condition and configuration were improved, therefore, revised drainage <br />calculations were not necessary. <br />• Washplant construction would encroach on the existing Pond D emergency spillway, so the spillway was <br />relocated to the center of the Pond D embankment, near the principal spillway. This location also improves <br />pond function by increasing the distance between the pond inlets and emergency spillway and improving <br />routing. <br />As part of the design process, four soil borings were completed for design of the foundation structures for the major <br />Washplant facilities (refer to Washplant H Foundation Design Report in Exhibit 25). Site backfill and grading <br />work for Washplant II involved removal of potentially unsuitable soil materials, ripping and scarification of the <br />entire washplant pad area, cut and fill grading, and controlled placement and compaction. Cut volumes were <br />approximately 24,000 cy, and approximately 12,000 cy of suitable fill and 10,000 cy of graded rock material were <br />placed and compacted, consistent with the foundation design recommendations. Backfilled and compacted pad <br />areas were then graded to direct surface runoff flows to the designed drainage and sediment control structures, and <br />(except for building foundation areas) graveled to control erosion, dust, and surface drainage. Graveled areas will <br />be utilized as yard -area driveways for equipment and operations /maintenance access to the Crushing/Sceening <br />• Building, Washplant, thickener, and Refuse Bin. Based on the foundation design recommendations, reinforced <br />concrete caissons were poured to support building foundations and conveyor supports. Reinforced concrete floor <br />slabs and grade walls were then formed and poured to connect to the concrete caisson support system. <br />TR08 -65 2.05 -32.2 07/08/08 <br />